From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William Henney" Subject: Re: an annoying indentation Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:53:55 -0500 Message-ID: <41c818190706150753j6f2eaa86rafa80cedb3b289bd@mail.gmail.com> References: <466ED55E.1070804@calicojack.co.uk> <3a39e8471057cbbd01a7dca42cdc3d39@science.uva.nl> <20070614105700.46b2b82d@CNDLS-3T02621> <28563.1181833352@lap1.smtl.co.uk> <982c465a6635a5e96e2ab7684fcff518@science.uva.nl> <41c818190706150644y5c0c909dy52cacbf022871b1c@mail.gmail.com> <8b3012ea89eadc6bd330d9af9c2b1315@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzDBV-0002uv-Jg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:53:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzDBU-0002u9-Ua for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:53:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzDBU-0002u1-SC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HzDBU-0001CZ-Fp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:53:56 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so779287wri for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:53:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8b3012ea89eadc6bd330d9af9c2b1315@science.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Yes, I did notice that extra bit in your proposal. However, > I think it will easily lead to unwanted behavior as well: > > ** heading > - item 1 > - item 2 > - item 3 > > will get you: > > ** heading > - item 1 > - item 2 > - item 3 > Yes, you are right. Probably best keep it as simple as possible then. Cheers Will --=20 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia