On 02/09/17 14:21, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Mario Castelán Castro <marioxcc.MT@yandex.com>
>> So what you are saying is that GNU Emacs is broken in that it assumes
>> that 1 Unicode code point corresponds to 1 glyph.
> 
> Which part of what I wrote led you to that conclusion?  That's not
> what I meant, not at all.  What I meant was that a Lisp program is
> broken if it uses 'length' to compute how many glyphs (the accurate
> term is "grapheme clusters", not "glyphs") correspond to the
> characters of a string.  It should use 'string-width' instead.

My apologies, I should have said “org-mode”, not “GNU Emacs” in the
message of mine that you quoted.

-- 
Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+(become+OR+eat)+vegan