From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Hansen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [BUG] widget-field-overlay becomes wrong Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:08:48 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <40E46F50.5080204@math.ku.dk> References: <40E28BE8.4030300@math.ku.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088712562 16817 80.91.224.253 (1 Jul 2004 20:09:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 01 22:09:10 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bg7rq-0001Tg-00 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bg7rq-0006d4-00 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bg7tc-0001a7-GQ for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bg7ta-0001a1-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bg7tY-0001Zp-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bg7tY-0001Zm-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.170.224.162] (helo=smtp.kabelnettet.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg7rc-0004xr-UZ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from math.ku.dk (0x52b410e6.dhcp.kabelnettet.dk [82.180.16.230]) by smtp.kabelnettet.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3C16099CE; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:08:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25360 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25360 Richard Stallman wrote: > Of cause a work-around is to never have a widget field adjacent to > another widget. > >If that is an acceptable solution, we can document it as a >requirement. Does anyone see a problem with that? > > I don't like that solution. What I meant to say is that it is not a serious bug, but it is a bug after all. I would rather like to see if I can come up with a fix.