From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8659: 24.0.50; doc string of comment-end-skip Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 06:45:57 -0700 Message-ID: <409A855E6F124F779E5646CD28EF8ABE@us.oracle.com> References: <0BCD0B03FE4C4CC298EFAF1FF810E140@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305208032 3531 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2011 13:47:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8659@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 15:47:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEN-0006JF-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:47:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEM-000583-Ps for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEJ-00057y-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEI-0001Kt-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEI-0001Kp-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWEH-0002te-JJ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8659 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8659-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8659.130520797911081 (code B ref 8659); Thu, 12 May 2011 13:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2011 13:46:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWDa-0002sg-Ks for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKWDY-0002sU-Q1 for 8659@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p4CDk9T4018068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 May 2011 13:46:11 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4CDk82Z004897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 May 2011 13:46:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt015.oracle.com (abhmt015.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4CDk3tY009005; Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.37.175) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:46:02 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcwQUeSQ5B6p/pFHS2mDHo8STJhJOAAWOYIg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 In-Reply-To: X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4DCBE4A3.0093:SCFMA922111,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46419 Archived-At: > > The latter seems wrong. End of a comment up to the > > comment's body? Is it "up to" that is wrong/odd > > ("back to"), or is the comment's body not > > the text that is commented out? > > The intended meaning is "back to", but my English skills aren't good > enough to write it correctly at the same time as concisely. Then let's use "back to" or similar, to indicate the direction more clearly.