From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>,
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Renaming NEWS
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 02:46:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40646l9wzy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86veemk1o5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 21 May 2007 10:42:50 +0200")
David Kastrup wrote:
> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> It also seems time (again, as Kim said earlier) for a fresh
>> lisp/ChangeLog and a new lisp/ChangeLog.12. The right thing to do here
>> is create ChangeLog.12 as a new file with no arch tag, and move most
>> of the current contents of ChangeLog there, right?
>
> Including moving the arch tag, I suppose.
No, leaving the arch tag in lisp/ChangeLog would seem to make more
sense to me. Anyone who is using this tag must expect it to refer to
the "current lisp ChangeLog", not some random ChangeLog.NN.
ChangeLog.12, which will almost never be used, should get a new arch
tag.
> I don't think we really should sync anything from the release branch
> for now. Fixes should make their way from the trunk to the release
> branch, not the other way round.
It has happened the other way around ever since the branch was
created, and continues to do so.
> And they should be few enough that synching them manually between
> ChangeLog and ChangeLog should be workable
People seem to find Miles' automated merging of changes from release
branch to trunk useful.
> (arch would presumably want to synch between ChangeLog.12 and
> ChangeLog).
Which is why I don't think the arch tag should be moved to ChangeLog.12.
>> What do people think the best split date is? The base of the release
>> branch, or perhaps 2006-12-31, to match ChangeLog.11?
>
> Base of release branch would be my preference.
Mine too, I think.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 10:02 [PATCH] Console based mouse face highlighting Nick Roberts
2007-05-12 10:11 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-12 13:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-12 23:54 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-13 3:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-13 4:19 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-13 4:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-14 21:11 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-15 3:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-15 3:53 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-15 21:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-15 21:33 ` David Kastrup
2007-05-16 3:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-15 22:39 ` [PATCH/Now RFA] " Nick Roberts
2007-05-16 3:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-16 3:54 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-16 10:00 ` [RFA] " Nick Roberts
2007-05-16 18:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-16 21:46 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-17 3:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-17 3:54 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-17 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-05-17 20:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-17 22:29 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-17 20:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-17 22:34 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-18 14:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-18 21:09 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-19 7:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-19 8:15 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-19 8:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-20 6:00 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-20 9:37 ` Johan Bockgård
2007-05-20 9:51 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 15:54 ` Johan Bockgård
2007-05-22 21:36 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-30 5:41 ` Nick Roberts
2007-06-03 1:12 ` Nick Roberts
2007-06-03 21:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-06-03 22:15 ` Drew Adams
2007-06-03 23:31 ` Nick Roberts
2007-06-04 3:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-20 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-20 20:12 ` Renaming NEWS [was: [RFA] Console based mouse face highlighting.] Glenn Morris
2007-05-20 20:42 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-20 21:31 ` Renaming NEWS Miles Bader
2007-05-21 8:09 ` Glenn Morris
2007-05-21 8:42 ` David Kastrup
2007-05-22 6:46 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
2007-05-22 7:12 ` Miles Bader
2007-05-22 17:08 ` Glenn Morris
2007-05-22 8:30 ` Richard Stallman
2007-05-22 17:09 ` Glenn Morris
2007-05-21 10:33 ` Renaming NEWS [was: [RFA] Console based mouse face highlighting.] Richard Stallman
2007-05-19 22:31 ` [RFA] Console based mouse face highlighting Richard Stallman
2007-05-14 16:57 ` [PATCH] " Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40646l9wzy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.