From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The art of closing bug reports Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3qliw7eyn3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310259774 25915 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 01:02:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:02:54 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-Devel devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 03:02:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiQ6-0001Te-BM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:02:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiQ4-0001mb-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiPi-0001ky-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiPh-0006ZM-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiPg-0006ZI-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39959) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfiPg-00037R-Do; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:02:24 -0400 X-Spook: class struggle Steve Case beanpole enemy of the state X-Ran: D+sw=)!ObufdK}QYZy$x=Dcf(OEIF8blUkZxg51rY(WoxtyxK*K|@_/htfAJ_u$*TT74d( X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:52:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141875 Archived-At: >> I am a bit disturbed by bug reports that are closed without much >> effort trying to understand if the bugs are still there. There is also an "art" to opening bug reports. It's well documented, and many people manage to do it. I'm sorry to say, but some bug reports are of such low quality that they essentially have no value. Leaving them open does nothing except dilute attention away from other reports where progress can be made.