From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22754: 25.1.50; Rmail does not follow RFC 2822 Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3ppovhilhp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87d1rquzlg.fsf@mbork.pl> <878u272v65.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456628717 17846 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2016 03:05:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 22754@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 28 04:05:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfP-0002wl-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 04:05:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfO-00062S-Cb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfK-00061E-V3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfK-00008G-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfJ-00008A-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrfJ-0000K3-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87d1rquzlg.fsf@mbork.pl> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22754 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22754-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22754.14566286761203 (code B ref 22754); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22754) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2016 03:04:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZret-0000JK-Uu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrer-0000J8-M8 for 22754@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrel-00004s-TP for 22754@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZred-0008VG-7n; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:19 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aZrec-0006E0-Bj; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:04:18 -0500 X-Spook: radar corporate security Listeria Becker Power Cyber X-Ran: *W_s:$&rIi'3&gQ|*)Il;u(qE_{FYwgsaq{hHW`W2OQ^CxmJ&6|Z(id87W;^gCH'1Y/$HE X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113993 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski wrote: > I've been told that if it is not stated explicitly that field names are > case-insensitive, they are not, and their names should nit be changed in > any way. > >> 1.2.2. Syntactic notation >> >> Characters will be specified either by a decimal value (e.g., the value >> %d65 for uppercase A and %d97 for lowercase A) or by a case-insensitive >> literal value enclosed in quotation marks (e.g., "A" for either >> uppercase or lowercase There's nothing in the RFC that supports what you were told. Where it says anything, it says the opposite, as I cited. The situation is the same in the later RFC 5322. See also the more explicit RFC 5234: ABNF strings are case insensitive and the character set for these strings is US-ASCII. [...] To specify a rule that is case sensitive, specify the characters individually. Any sane mail app should be prepared for "CC:", "Cc:", "cc:", or even "cC:".