Re: postscript print buffer

Re: postscript print buffer

[Francois Fleuret]

Hi,

Niels Freimann wrote on 30 Apr 2003 18:39:06 MET:

> I appreciate postscript print buffer very much, however I don't know
> how to configure larger fonts. Any idea?

(setq ps-font-size 12)

seems to do that sort of thing.

And have you noticed that PC keyboards have a "print" key ? This is my
setting for ps-print:

>> (defun ps-print-in-file (filename)
>>   "Prints the buffer in a postscript file" (interactive "FPS file: ")
>>   (ps-print-buffer-with-faces filename))
>> 
>> (define-key global-map [(print)] 'ps-print-in-file)
>> (define-key global-map [(shift print)] 'ps-print-buffer-with-faces)

So that [print] alone prints to a file (and asks for the filename
first) and [shift print] prints directly.

Regards,

FF

Re: postscript print buffer

[Niels Freimann]

Hi Francois,

thanks a lot! Have a nice day.

Cheers
-Niels 

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 21:29, Francois Fleuret wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Freimann wrote on 30 Apr 2003 18:39:06 MET:
> > I appreciate postscript print buffer very much, however I don't know
> > how to configure larger fonts. Any idea?
>
> (setq ps-font-size 12)
>
> seems to do that sort of thing
>
> And have you noticed that PC keyboards have a "print" key ? This is my
>
> setting for ps-print:
> >> (defun ps-print-in-file (filename)
> >>   "Prints the buffer in a postscript file" (interactive "FPS file: ")
> >>   (ps-print-buffer-with-faces filename))
> >>
> >> (define-key global-map [(print)] 'ps-print-in-file)
> >> (define-key global-map [(shift print)] 'ps-print-buffer-with-faces)
>
> So that [print] alone prints to a file (and asks for the filename
> first) and [shift print] prints directly
>
> Regards,
>
> FF
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs

Re: postscript print buffer

[John McCabe]

On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:39:06 +0200, Niels Freimann
<nfreimann@firemail.de> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I appreciate postscript print buffer very much, however I don't know how =
>to=20
>configure larger fonts. Any idea?

Have a read of the text at the front of the ps-print.el file in your
emacs\lisp subdirectory. Might give you some more ideas of what needs
to be set up.

Best Regards
John McCabe

To reply by email replace 'nospam' with 'assen'

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Peter Dyballa]

Hello!

In Emacs 22.0.50 from CVS and in 21.3.50 it works to print a buffer 
contents with diacritics when this buffer is in Unicode or it's the 
Holidays or Calendar buffer that do not explain in which mood they are. 
The € I can't see because no regular PostScript font has it.

Buffers in most Latin scripts are *not* correctly printed in PS when 
they contain diacritics.

I have a text file with this in its header ";;; -*- mode: Text; coding: 
utf-8; -*-" that displays in GNU Emacs of course in UTF-8. This file 
contains the Adobe Standard Encoding in that kind:

;   oct   dec   hex   UTF8
;===================================
   =  40 =  32 = 20 =     20 = U+0020 : SPACE
! =  41 =  33 = 21 =     21 = U+0021 : EXCLAMATION MARK


When I print this buffer the following characters are not printed:

⁄ = 244 = 164 = A4 = E28184 = U+2044 : FRACTION SLASH
ƒ = 246 = 166 = A6 =   C692 = U+0192 : LATIN SMALL LETTER F WITH HOOK
“ = 252 = 170 = AA = E2809C = U+201C : LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
‹ = 254 = 172 = AC = E280B9 = U+2039 : SINGLE LEFT-POINTING ANGLE 
QUOTATION MARK
› = 255 = 173 = AD = E280BA = U+203A : SINGLE RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE 
QUOTATION MARK
fi = 256 = 174 = AE = EFAC81 = U+FB01 : LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI
fl = 257 = 175 = AF = EFAC82 = U+FB02 : LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL
– = 261 = 177 = B1 = E28093 = U+2013 : EN DASH
† = 262 = 178 = B2 = E280A0 = U+2020 : DAGGER
‡ = 263 = 179 = B3 = E280A1 = U+2021 : DOUBLE DAGGER
• = 267 = 183 = B7 = E280A2 = U+2022 : BULLET
‚ = 270 = 184 = B8 = E2809A = U+201A : SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
„ = 271 = 185 = B9 = E2809E = U+201E : DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
” = 272 = 186 = BA = E2809D = U+201D : RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
… = 274 = 188 = BC = E280A6 = U+2026 : HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS
‰ = 275 = 189 = BD = E280B0 = U+2030 : PER MILLE SIGN
ˆ = 303 = 195 = C3 =   CB86 = U+02C6 : MODIFIER LETTER CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
˜ = 304 = 196 = C4 =   CB9C = U+02DC : SMALL TILDE
˘ = 306 = 198 = C6 =   CB98 = U+02D8 : BREVE
˙ = 307 = 199 = C7 =   CB99 = U+02D9 : DOT ABOVE
˚ = 312 = 202 = CA =   CB9A = U+02DA : RING ABOVE
˝ = 315 = 205 = CD =   CB9D = U+02DD : DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT
˛ = 316 = 206 = CE =   CB9B = U+02DB : OGONEK
ˇ = 317 = 207 = CF =   CB87 = U+02C7 : CARON
— = 320 = 208 = D0 = E28094 = U+2014 : EM DASH
Ł = 350 = 232 = E8 =   C581 = U+0141 : LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH 
STROKE
Π= 352 = 234 = EA =   C592 = U+0152 : LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE
ı = 365 = 245 = F5 =   C4B1 = U+0131 : LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I
ł = 370 = 248 = F8 =   C582 = U+0142 : LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH STROKE
œ = 372 = 250 = FA =   C593 = U+0153 : LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE


Using an ISO-Latin 9/ISO 8859-15 buffer with this string in its header 
";;; -*- mode: Text; coding: iso-8859-15; -*-" the following characters 
are not shown:

€ = 244 = 164 = A4 = U+20AC : EURO SIGN				            ; not in PS
Š = 246 = 166 = A6 = U+0160 : LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CARON
š = 250 = 168 = A8 = U+0161 : LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CARON
Ž = 264 = 180 = B4 = U+017D : LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH CARON
ž = 270 = 184 = B8 = U+017E : LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON
Π= 274 = 188 = BC = U+0152 : LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE
œ = 275 = 189 = BD = U+0153 : LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE
Ÿ = 276 = 190 = BE = U+0178 : LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS


I did PS print the buffers into the CUPS. My printer was not on so I 
had time to convert the print jobs with ps2pdf14, based on gs 8.14, 
into PDF which I viewed with TeXShop 1.35e. I have some more test files 
encoded in other Latin scripts that do not print well ...

--
Greetings

   Pete

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Web.DE>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:37:03 +0200
> Cc: 
> 
> Buffers in most Latin scripts are *not* correctly printed in PS when 
> they contain diacritics.

For Latin scripts other than Latin-1, I'm quite sure you need to
customize the value of ps-mule-font-info-database-latin, for ps-print
to work correctly.

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Web.DE>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:37:03 +0200
> > Cc: 
> > 
> > Buffers in most Latin scripts are *not* correctly printed in PS when 
> > they contain diacritics.
> 
> For Latin scripts other than Latin-1, I'm quite sure you need to
> customize the value of ps-mule-font-info-database-latin, for ps-print
> to work correctly.

That's what I thought too ... 

ray

Postscript Print Buffer

[Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle]

Hello guys,

I started diving into some "complicated" stuff - at least for my humble
mind: Postscript printing with emacs.  And I have to say I don't quite
get it.  The following settings are to be found in my .emacs:

 '(ps-font-family (quote Palatino))
 '(ps-lpr-command "lpr")
 '(ps-paper-type (quote a4))
 '(ps-printer-name-option "-P")

I avoided diving into this since some times now - now I want to "crack
the nut", so to say - and let me start with asking for help to eliminate
a problem first: Whenever I now try to print via Postscript Print Buffer
(B+W) the german Umlauts aren't printed - no matter which (given)
font-family I use.  If I instead use M-x print-buffer the Umlauts are
printed but the printout doesn't look so nice - which tells me, that
there is a big difference between the two commands.

I use emacs 21.4. on Debian Sarge with Cups ... and certainly I do have
way more questions ... later :-)

ray

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:22:10 +0100
> From: Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle <Raimund.Kohl@nabuli.de>
> 
> I avoided diving into this since some times now - now I want to "crack
> the nut", so to say - and let me start with asking for help to eliminate
> a problem first: Whenever I now try to print via Postscript Print Buffer
> (B+W) the german Umlauts aren't printed - no matter which (given)
> font-family I use.

font-family is the wrong place to look.  You should instead customize
the value of ps-multibyte-buffer (which see).  Based on what you tell,
the value of `bdf-font-except-latin' will do what you want.

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:22:10 +0100
> > From: Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle <Raimund.Kohl@nabuli.de>
> > 
> > I avoided diving into this since some times now - now I want to "crack
> > the nut", so to say - and let me start with asking for help to eliminate
> > a problem first: Whenever I now try to print via Postscript Print Buffer
> > (B+W) the german Umlauts aren't printed - no matter which (given)
> > font-family I use.
> 
> font-family is the wrong place to look.  You should instead customize
> the value of ps-multibyte-buffer (which see).  Based on what you tell,
> the value of `bdf-font-except-latin' will do what you want.

 '(ps-font-family (quote Palatino))
 '(ps-lpr-command "lp")
 '(ps-multibyte-buffer (quote bdf-font-except-latin))
 '(ps-paper-type (quote a4))
 '(ps-printer-name-option "")

I guess that's what you mean, right?  Ok, did that but nothing changed
(yes, I byte-compiled .emacs) - no Umlauts with PS Print Buffer (B+W).

What else could I do?

ray

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Comments: In-reply-to "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
>    message dated "Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:42:29 +0200."
> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:17:37 +0100
> From: Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle <Raimund.Kohl@nabuli.de>
> 
>  '(ps-font-family (quote Palatino))
>  '(ps-lpr-command "lp")
>  '(ps-multibyte-buffer (quote bdf-font-except-latin))
>  '(ps-paper-type (quote a4))
>  '(ps-printer-name-option "")
> 
> I guess that's what you mean, right?

I don't know, since I don't quite understand where this fragment
belongs to.

Could you simply set the option manually, before using
ps-print-buffer, and see if that helps?

> Ok, did that but nothing changed (yes, I byte-compiled .emacs)

You also need to restart Emacs after changing .emacs.

> no Umlauts with PS Print Buffer (B+W).

What do you see in print instead of Umlauts?

Also, does your Postscript printer support Umlauts and other accented
characters?

Finally, what Latin-N encoding do you use by default in your Emacs?
That is, what is your locale?

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> What do you see in print instead of Umlauts?

%% Show vacant box for characters which don't have appropriate font.

> Because "Latin" doesn't mean "Latin-9".

Ah ... ok, I am learning ...

> > Ok, anyway, setting to
> > `bdf-font-except-latin' didn't change that behaviour.
> 
> Something's clearly wrong, but I cannot figure out what.  You will
> have to debug this yourself.  One thing I'd do is print to a file (use
> ps-print-buffer with a numeric argument, and it will prompt for a file
> name), then look at that file to see what stands for the accented
> characters there.

I edited a text file containing just two words: Übel ärgerlich;  now
here follows the output:

.......snip.................................

%%Page: 1 1
/Lines 2 def
/PageCount 1 def
1 BeginSheet
BeginDSCPage
/LineNumber 1 def
/PageNumber 1 def
/HeaderLinesLeft[
 [/h0 (Uebel.txt)]
 [/h1 (~/)]
]def
/HeaderLinesRight[
 [/h0 /pagenumberstring load]
 [/h1 (27.03.2005)]
]def
2 SetHeaderLines
0 BeginPage
/f0 F
false BG
0.000 0.000 0.000 FG
0 EF
1 1 SB
/f0 F         <----------
(bel ) S      <----------
1 1 SB
/f0 F         <----------
(rgerlich) S  <----------
PHL
EndPage
EndDSCPage
EndSheet

%%Trailer
%%Pages: 1

EndDoc

%%EOF

.......snap.................................


and here's the part printed by a2ps:
			    ========

.......snip.................................

%%Page: (1) 1
%%BeginPageSetup
/pagesave save def
%%EndPageSetup
iso1dict begin
gsave
llx lly 12 add translate
/v 0 store
/x0 x v get 4.703931 add sx cw mul add store
/y0 y v get bfs th add sub store
x0 y0 moveto
(\334bel \344rgerlich) p n                          <-------------
(Uebel.txt) (Seite 1/1) (M\344r 27, 05 0:23) title
border
grestore
(Gedruckt von Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle) rhead
() (1/1) (Sonntag M\344rz 27, 2005) footer
end % of iso1dict
pagesave restore
showpage

%%Trailer
end
%%EOF

.......snap.................................

> Sorry, I don't understand this.  Can you explain what it means?

oblings or rectangles made of very fine lines

> 
> > > Also, does your Postscript printer support Umlauts and other accented
> > > characters?
> > 
> > As said above, all other printing-systems work without any problems.
> > Btw, I use a HP LaserJet4000N ... a network printer - and I checked
> > before if the fonts (palatino) are supported ... they certainly are.
> 
> If you print out the entire Palatino font in your printer, does it
> include accented Latin-9 characters?

How can I do that ... I would like to give this a try

> > my .emacs holds the following settings:
> > 
> > '(current-language-environment "Latin-9")
> > '(default-input-method "latin-9-prefix")
> 
> So you are using Latin-9.  I wonder if using Latin-1 instead will
> help resolve your problem.

AFAIK there is just one difference between latin-1 and latin-9, and
that's the Euro-symbol in latin-9

ray

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Comments: In-reply-to "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
> 	message dated "Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:34:26 +0200."
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:55:39 +0100
> From: Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle <Raimund.Kohl@nabuli.de>
> 
> /f0 F         <----------
> (bel ) S      <----------
> 1 1 SB
> /f0 F         <----------
> (rgerlich) S  <----------

On my machine, I see \334 and \344 here.

Could you please try this in "emacs -q --no-site-file", without any
changes to the fonts, and see if that changes something?

And which Emacs version is that, btw?

> > If you print out the entire Palatino font in your printer, does it
> > include accented Latin-9 characters?
> 
> How can I do that ... I would like to give this a try

You need to go to the printer and look through the various sub-menus
of its Self-Test menu.  One of them should print the available fonts.

> > So you are using Latin-9.  I wonder if using Latin-1 instead will
> > help resolve your problem.
> 
> AFAIK there is just one difference between latin-1 and latin-9, and
> that's the Euro-symbol in latin-9

Inside Emacs, all of them are different.

Re: Postscript Print Buffer

[Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > /f0 F         <----------
> > (bel ) S      <----------
> > 1 1 SB
> > /f0 F         <----------
> > (rgerlich) S  <----------
> 
> On my machine, I see \334 and \344 here.

Ah ... can you hint me to where to look, please?

> Could you please try this in "emacs -q --no-site-file", without any
> changes to the fonts, and see if that changes something?

Did that - even removed .Xresources and logged in - no change.  Exactly
the same output.

> And which Emacs version is that, btw?

21.4.1. on Debian Sarge

> > > If you print out the entire Palatino font in your printer, does it
> > > include accented Latin-9 characters?
> > 
> > How can I do that ... I would like to give this a try

The printer does print out Umlauts ... there is a message right BEFORE
printing:  "Fonts for some characters not found, continue anyway ..."
so I suppose it's not the printer.

> Inside Emacs, all of them are different.

Ah, ok, but then there must be a table or whatever to check out ... no?

I don't like to feel like a stupid ... :-( <sigh>

ray

postscript print buffer

[Niels Freimann]

Hi,

I appreciate postscript print buffer very much, however I don't know how to 
configure larger fonts. Any idea?