From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 21:28:20 +0300 Message-ID: <3e6713eb-5c8e-9cb4-f0f8-c61ee7245706@yandex.ru> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83zhaih0oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> <2432C664-3EEB-41F4-B8D0-B5358189957E@icloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="44347"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , =?UTF-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 09 20:29:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUDk-000BPi-Me for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 20:29:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUDj-0008TS-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 14:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUD2-00082y-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 14:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:37724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUD2-0002Md-1P; Sat, 09 May 2020 14:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id k1so5782510wrx.4; Sat, 09 May 2020 11:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lp0iGlU1ElYzEF7Ze1MW1rJBH+OJab9hYTSY/IwxAAI=; b=cJAV0lTU3v2quocoJm1RUjVqKrpp7IL7uYAnnQ0as7jxWqtL4vrIxqBOQ2n5kqy4Wt 5vWB+XZDoOR1/l7ov5vF+RNE7eudnHrNZu0rF6SJeNTTL+qP1Gro9/lCXQMpCuj/BCB+ DC3C3B30pYvtlJv4WPKpYwNX/JTKvjx+26Z5uioVHc4y41CavD0MuPGrnmsZN/cj+Jys H/BcQAtkx1gJu4dN3mJgfDAARNp3YLsxxcFmuS/cn+7gxFrkX7tFSyKrDJJRqZJ9X+Lm NmHouNDczsOdH4K34qTl4ljiYy36mueLyVh3ge1sdRUkiAjmV+XK24H8bM3JpfeFvnzR 5MCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lp0iGlU1ElYzEF7Ze1MW1rJBH+OJab9hYTSY/IwxAAI=; b=bOUSMSP12kHDisY5B2QYabjCrGs2I143ekoarN70bYWscZoFf87e/8wCGuJlIYQMfw qV3YCUIcnDNoRigHyf6sF9Iwx73Oow5jML/q0h0CqRjWVWbb+o7FeOn/1eKGvqNu4Q9e ssM9HPAIzmz/JvGAce038CSoQV8Bm9NFtUENB5734Yf/H+WUcdPdaGnshSHeijW5XzqN 1YM12wxxa8D5ktaONkBkv8YOSxzXZuDrFjvahHpxeFkbnQmyBuLA5Bb3+Tz0vqd4srvu Z+QgURTL/8WZQYYrjTeyBtt5lKtpFif2E72QEC5RuKljHVivbExfycRIKzVmY3tf4xxI mPZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puafm1Bl+wmGy5Q2/vVtlby5zXhWFKNKiBQynykSTLK0GrDX4/EQ CQNhOQniwqiMuNQ/vJHW4iE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJN5YRdbeWMEaNU07YdlCnqZdmcL0p63batiBhkl2ca4j0md3CxJ5gtLDNUTCumHFPgdPYiIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4ccd:: with SMTP id c13mr9625505wrt.415.1589048902086; Sat, 09 May 2020 11:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o6sm9560043wrw.63.2020.05.09.11.28.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 May 2020 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249536 Archived-At: On 09.05.2020 19:02, João Távora wrote: > Are you sure about this and LSP? I mean tree-sitter is fantastic, but > I'm pretty sure LSP has some of this at least outlined: > > https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/18 Perhaps we should suspend this discussion until it's in the spec, and there are at least some LSP servers that implement it. > Having "full" LSP in Emacs would certain give us better > arguments to lobby for a less VSCode-centric specification. With the minority marketshare, and Microsoft being Microsoft, I really doubt that. They don't even have a conforming LSP server for TypeScript, for crying out loud.