From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 22.2 slower than 21.3 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <3e378e1e-5de0-4faa-8f86-a1d712676c29@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> References: <217aa644-6378-4fa1-992b-8d5af4edcfb5@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220015354 16586 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2008 13:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:09:14 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 15:10:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZ3jr-0001F7-L7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:10:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ3it-0005ig-6U for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:09:07 -0400 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 47 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.70.2.252 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1220009749 21578 127.0.0.1 (29 Aug 2008 11:35:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.70.2.252; posting-account=dW57HQoAAADk4fCqYpIqOMZ2vxYbu-Pd User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:161748 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:05:43 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:57097 On Aug 29, 1:22=A0pm, Martin Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > =A0 Robert writes: > > =A0 > Hi, > =A0 > > =A0 > I just installed 22.2 (pre-built binary for Windows XP), but find i= t > =A0 > slower than 21.3. I notice when opening C-files. I went straight ba= ck > =A0 > to 21.3 now because of that. > > How did you measure, that it is slower. I just noticed when opening a C source file I am working on. Counted seconds now, see below. > > =A0 > > =A0 > I have not been following this group regularly, is this a well know= n > =A0 > issue? Will this get faster in upcoming versions? The problem could > =A0 > perhaps also be that the binary for Windows was built differently. > =A0 > Have others seen the same as me? > > No, but you could try the 22.3 pretest binary from > > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/emacs-22.2.91-bin-i386... Thanks for the link, I tried that version and it is virtually indistinguishable from the 21.3 version. I tried to count now, and the file opens within one second with 21.3 and 22.2.91. With 22.2 it takes 4 seconds. Even when I kill the buffer and reopen the file again from dired it takes 4 seconds. I am happy to see that 22.2.91 is just as fast as 21.3. I won't bother filing any bug then, I'll just skip the 22.2 version. Thanks again. -Robert > > and send a bug report if necessary. > > Martin