From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for emacs-30? Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 16:48:22 +0300 Message-ID: <3b153949-c990-49c9-9618-28850d3ee57c@gutov.dev> References: <87y13mznw9.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <86h6aa7gw1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ploya1hc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <867cb67888.fsf@gnu.org> <10dd3554-4249-41d1-864d-30cab687da6a@gutov.dev> <86o74i5edp.fsf@gnu.org> <690fff1d-b8f2-4e6e-b105-21ca97a0a92e@gutov.dev> <86ldzl5vzj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: spwhitton@spwhitton.name, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 21 15:49:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ss0UB-0006YY-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 15:49:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ss0TQ-0007iQ-50; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ss0TO-0007iF-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.156]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ss0TM-00013E-KR; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9861140131; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1726926507; x=1727012907; bh=RbJNnzU5FH74E9Gffg5JsmxiwGDpq9MF3hFoCeBCWyU=; b= WAgvaCZk58mTitUSqBKqqOmJN+UjE3O7GkqzqjwUyLp29AvmHUGCAXug9CMCT5dP zt1bguW4qTuT0MfMdpj6nSAoANnbRIdIVsPdkTfEPqex7sf2UGzg168diqGack87 WVn7GkcTXtShd9vuhj3dOO2JlrjxLMwBehXhFfq66zfK3ZDsdXG6jFTKeQQaDIoS u3Fta31wU/cQhyN2NOy8GAhyxWrMHMCEapznJGOwqRQEWH66mloDRNqD+9RWmnco RJRDKzoOcuR6Podk2DF4dzhvQZHeMlyUSlVDsIJvp9dUdDqfinkKxL1r+S8qMklJ t7JrE8c1meEpBsoT3mZ57g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1726926507; x= 1727012907; bh=RbJNnzU5FH74E9Gffg5JsmxiwGDpq9MF3hFoCeBCWyU=; b=h cfNKifENy2XNdQihrUFabwKeR5zkuBGg+cXgWTcxI8D+lH4GTZtHvfonkF6XOSon xRLNb0YRfzQdtzcuuXdNWIerg6k9dHCZtTEE/Kwic/KiA/XCEV1cpek48EO+4fT9 M5gsX4BC65PXrL0d8+rpKUoGdCRqkP+1Zy1Q+XLcsn+8/rscA8uq32qt472WZ+2t 19zxj6a7a5fYOUE4yne/lXRAfBfbtUwHumFF8wWX7IG2iLULS8bQ/5wPEVKoIExK JJuhoByrNrZfiTy0J/mbxWXMqm6uPj04XeopT9QPoMs5+9otbSG++AAwobg2FyMB c67J6o1uk89Z0kbDVR8hw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelhedgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtvdej necuhfhrohhmpeffmhhithhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdrug gvvheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteduleejgeehtefgheegjeekueehvdevieekueef tddvtdevfefhvdevgedujeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepughmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthho peefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegvlhhiiiesghhnuhdrohhrgh dprhgtphhtthhopehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgdprhgt phhtthhopegvmhgrtghsqdguvghvvghlsehgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i07de48aa:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:48:25 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86ldzl5vzj.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.156; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323890 Archived-At: On 21/09/2024 10:03, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Maybe do that on master, though. > > Why on master? what's the danger of doing this on the release branch? > No code is changed, only data, and it only affects the files that > etags would tag anyway. > >> Scanning for tags in files that aren't considered code like .html or >> .texi, etc might create a lot more navigation locations, not all of them >> wanted in 'C-u M-.' completion. >> >> I'm not actually sure it will be a problem, but it seems like a major >> enough change to allow for user feedback first. > > But etags-regen is not only about completion, is it? Its main > purpose, AFAIU, is to automatically regenerate tags tables when they > are outdated. Or what am I missing? I've never generated tags for HTML or Texinfo files, and didn't really think about it as an option. Do you? So I suggest drawing the line somewhere between tags for text and tags for code. We can add all the programming file extensions in emacs-30 and for 31 somebody might implement the "no Fortran fallback" option, so we might drop the list of extensions altogether. We would have time to restore it before the next release, though, if particular problems come up (e.g. drop in performance).