From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 16:28:10 +0300 Message-ID: <3adf65ae-fd0d-4fee-adfd-e11d39a148fc@yandex.ru> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> <2468efa6-7dbd-8634-44cc-586bb6985f49@yandex.ru> <83pnbddrfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k11ldpxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5dnun.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7wpdms7.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftc9dm07.fsf@gnu.org> <0d678371-2df7-519e-5ec0-7e26bfa6ea34@gmail.com> <11dff979-002e-e03e-2e3e-cdb09fcc409e@yandex.ru> <8017be3d-a4ed-61eb-9bdb-9a95c77a0698@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="40572"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 15:28:59 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXm0p-000AQM-Ld for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 15:28:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXm0o-0005IR-NS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXm06-0004rt-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]:39446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXm05-0001QB-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id l18so7437920wrn.6 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:28:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ALtJCc19QJvlfDBV4ZgEL3xaNctDz3MhdLqLn8pujow=; b=I7QeU/w1iNi0cDYl1aTZB06wMNMA3ZrTqFImzlzVGXeCJCLbXh57BUdGB2koBrHjuW ItkfncQ8bl2f9mNtusaf4G93Rowc7W4qyv9G+OQSTEmsMJ3CDQ/JZQknznvGOCxDleql 2i4i2poyDOodZz3bkt36Aj92iLJAJ89B2m+1LALwkTz/qhVKiWxjR6JqxwEBh297WlVz uBjoc7t7ih9zsAUUI0dFxWfMBIrzzjWvosR0dGs99RB83IS1Xk7tfon/6l1oJZRqVAfO TiIkawWXqg9LAabdNEKQpjQTEw5Uma5Et/Hs+aW5iZWlpMi/UwROrUyNVXJpZ0s4eziX TAeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ALtJCc19QJvlfDBV4ZgEL3xaNctDz3MhdLqLn8pujow=; b=MEnAbOFxyRp4z90IMY3B6OsDLg+LdJvRBW2rD+l8WEY5jpYN6HBCvaqjRzXel7XC5/ 9bVJZ5H0+66/s3NCh1ynWlO3AsWU2xqYomOZwn6Wct9iMXMWO9iGiMfvVc+641CDh4d8 MAo+k7j3gdziDUj+zZdu3wEZTZOGhVubskXwsUSAoxwicL+6/JxV/7jvKNN8Suhztsj/ EPkbjobis7adh7GmkdAlR8oK1SFWFCqRXZcWcI5u8winm8TD9dVi+Ko8JvI/Rle8qWvq k+1YgMzQtAeMH7HEOaK33uvhZVjplK/fXk0qIwAgCATCFvBjSFNpKMZBueDZ7Qyb10Bw LLmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ6WuXQvVPnI859wBTtnODa+bYVBfaAicsgmzQnOeUTH78ApnEl KSI0QaQ58Q6ScVAJ2445IoB6syUB X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLVTG6gDw/dPb27kXAY2FuCsFOxEaBIXJ+0O1a7CfNn3DeyxLckSC2P+dD0d9sHf1nVVqzP+Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f1c4:: with SMTP id z4mr14515804wro.25.1589117292101; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm15231364wmm.47.2020.05.10.06.28.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 May 2020 06:28:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8017be3d-a4ed-61eb-9bdb-9a95c77a0698@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42a; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249654 Archived-At: On 10.05.2020 07:08, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote: >>>> In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well, we*should*  present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction videos, documentation, tutorials, etc. >>> But why more than lsp-mode? >> >> Because they choose to participate in the "core" Emacs development very little? > > Oh? I thought we chose to exclude them by writing a competing package instead of trying to bring them aboard. We did what? I didn't write anything like that. Only one person did, on his own volition. Then the package got added to ELPA on usual conditions. > What does it mean for an external package to participate in the core Emacs development? Well, um, that would mean for individual authors to participate, I guess. Maybe contribute useful code as libraries. Example of another failed discussion: https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-ui/issues/50 And for packages to be contributed to GNU ELPA, with the subsequent possibility of having useful bits extracted and generalized. >> And because they chose not to get included in GNU ELPA, which would be a "reward" in itself (oob availability for new users). We couldn't mention packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently anyway. > > Really? The only thing I could find is https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/issues/83, where the general opinion is that it would be good for lsp-mode to be in core, until they (mistakenly) seem to conclude that eglot is in core already. What am I missing? You're missing the first sentence in the message you are looking at. What do you expect? I'm tired of chasing people and asking them to contribute. Do you fault me not going there and asking again? >> We couldn't mention packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently anyway. > > Why? Is the policy that it's bad to endorse code not *owned* by the FSF? We can't make adding MELPA to the archives list a part of an official tutorial. For multiple reasons, code ownership only one of them.