From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: How to restore the layout? Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3adc7813-af1e-48ab-9dae-c774021cea3b@default> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <4E4C522D-DBCC-4133-A764-82C9CCE81E2D@swipnet.se> <8913208E-7FE2-41F5-AC93-000108413C47@swipnet.se> <51D126A4.50402@gmx.at> <55419fed-b69d-4d07-81b2-b5b70f113929@default> <54cfe77b-f378-4402-b185-21372177ed60@default> <51D3EE9A.2050900@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372860517 5016 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2013 14:08:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Emacs developers To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 03 16:08:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNjY-0004c9-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:08:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNjX-0002PQ-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNjQ-0002PL-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:08:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNjP-0002y3-Gg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:19174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNjP-0002xi-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r63E8LTe007835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:08:22 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r63E8KmJ022117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:08:21 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt111.oracle.com (abhmt111.oracle.com [141.146.116.63]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r63E8KP7022104; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:08:20 GMT In-Reply-To: <51D3EE9A.2050900@gmx.at> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.7 (607090) [OL 12.0.6668.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161471 Archived-At: > > AFAIK, you will never be able to get rid of the frame created initiall= y, > > which has its own minibuffer. That was the point here. If you want a > > standalone minibuffer frame, and if you want it to be the only such > > (which I would again argue is the typical case of MF users), then AFAI= K > > you must create the MF at the outset. > > (let ((frame (selected-frame)) > frame-1 frame-2) > (setq frame-1 (make-frame '((minibuffer . only)))) > (setq default-minibuffer-frame frame-1) > (setq frame-2 (make-frame '((minibuffer . none)))) > (delete-frame frame)) (Similar reply from Juanma.) I stand corrected; thanks. And it is the case in older Emacs versions also= . Dunno what exactly I was thinking of. Sorry for the misinformation, and thanks for the correction.