From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: sh-script mode does not understand printf Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:11:03 -0700 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3FB17A97.4050900@yahoo.com> References: <3FAF6698.5000301@Nols.de> <3FAFB84C.5060101@yahoo.com> <93smkupvn5.fsf@xpc14.ast.cam.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1068595981 19366 80.91.224.253 (12 Nov 2003 00:13:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 12 01:12:59 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AJid1-0004m5-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:12:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AJjZa-0003cf-5s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:13:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AJjZY-0003Xt-0G for bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AJjZ1-0003Ab-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [216.168.1.22] (helo=trinity.supernews.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AJjYh-0002sl-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.11.165]:55149 ident=root) by trinity.supernews.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AJibC-0002kw-Kf for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:11:06 +0000 Original-Received: by mail.fu-berlin.de (Smail3.2.0.98) from Curry.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (160.45.10.36) with esmtp id ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:11:05 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by Curry.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (Smail3.2.0.98) from news.fu-berlin.de with bsmtp id ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:11:05 +0100 (MET) Original-To: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Original-Path: 170.207.51.80!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Original-Lines: 26 X-Orig-NNTP-Posting-Host: 170.207.51.80 X-Orig-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1068595865 52693886 170.207.51.80 (16 [82742]) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020406 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:6126 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:6126 Kevin Rodgers wrote: > Glenn Morris wrote: >> That's an awkward one, because (AFAICS) sh-script.el doesn't know >> anything about ksh93. "ksh" is assumed to be ksh88. Do you think ksh88 >> and ksh93 differ significantly enough for it to be worth adding code >> for ksh93 to sh-script? Is "ksh" these days more likely to be ksh88 or >> ksh93? > > That's a good question. The folks on comp.unix.shell would say ksh93 > (which > does have a lot of new features I'm just now learning about), but Sun e.g. > still distributes ksh88. What do the major GNU/Linux distributions > provide? > > http://kornshell.com/ > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/ Oops, I meant to include a link to their (non-free) software license: http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html -- Kevin Rodgers