From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hin-Tak Leung Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: emacs-19.34 segfauls when built with Xfree 4.3.0 (glibc 2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:11:05 +0100 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3EC4D559.4080501@yahoo.co.uk> References: <3EBFB256.4000504@yahoo.co.uk> <3EC27019.1060307@yahoo.co.uk> <3EC4BF98.3000209@yahoo.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053087149 10792 80.91.224.249 (16 May 2003 12:12:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 16 14:12:26 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Ge3J-0002iQ-00 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Ge1G-0000IJ-05 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Ge13-0000HR-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Ge11-0000F6-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Gdyi-0007sM-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from m143-mp1.cvx1-c.cam.dial.ntli.net (HELO yahoo.co.uk) (hintak?leung@62.253.152.143 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2003 12:06:17 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: Original-cc: rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:5080 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:5080 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Hin-Tak Leung writes: > > |> (c) there doesn't seem to be any check for recent version (<14 months) > |> of GNU ld (where the precise problem is)? or indeed, the presence of > |> any version of GNU ld? > > There is no need for it. Why is that so? It isn't unthinkable that on a non-'GNU/Linux' system, somebody installed a recent version of GNU binutils, and that get used by gcc instead of the default ld, which in turn get used by emacs. It is rare, I agree, and probably not worth the effort.