From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:26:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267112728 2904 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 15:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:45:28 +0000 (UTC) To: "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 16:45:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkftu-0005hG-TN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:45:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkftu-0003Lg-AR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkfbp-0004Ic-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:26:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59555 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkfbn-0004Fw-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:26:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkfbm-0003m8-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:26:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:40886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkfbm-0003lr-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:26:34 -0500 Original-Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2so287188vws.0 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:26:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=6gNkxHMqOSNLqW9QOujf9X8AOqzS9KEIPhB5J7o/Tek=; b=KQnBfUnDz8Kne3J67/3F5kd71NkqpsvIgaATfHofvnxPzNCNQ4zf5AwzNApaOPhrFo YRKMX1qWuDyWl3B41FCLB6za2tqYN5BnhNphAI8x5CRhf8LZweMR4N+Uv45EuQwK74T2 EX++5c4b/0WOjlu/h1MFxSSL4U0q4YjC6wvSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=UjFXaoGgC0kobhUpAuoADCYV+3WZACKykMN5mc9PsIyuLxWI1MMjS9bITFQIoZn/2y guyjiaPN2m9q40PV9Fj5kK+1vroF9lUpVLhv+QP4w0hEYXnLFAkdx/AJCNqSqUXUg6up H8dYiPXnrk9s+mwKnFC3gM5wlbCIF5583M7HE= Original-Received: by 10.220.128.16 with SMTP id i16mr563423vcs.108.1267111592511; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:26:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from scarlett.psy.cmu.edu (SCARLETT.PSY.CMU.EDU [128.2.249.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm61575314vws.14.2010.02.25.07.26.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:26:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121360 Archived-At: On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:11 PM, Robert J. Chassell wrote: > You seem to have committed share/emacs/site-lisp/w3m/ and the files > to the Emacs trunk. Isn't it a mistake? >=20 > Yes. =20 So, this has been rectified by another commit, but now everyone has 30MB = of garbage in their history. Mistakes can happen, and they will especially since the bzr setup makes = it easy to commit all changed files and push them without further = checks. Entering the log message in an editor makes it easier to see = the list of changed files - the -m parameter for a quick change seems = dangerous. I am a little surprised that additional files got added = without explicit interaction with bzr. The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30 = MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're = talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository = (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when checking = out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.) Would the equivalent of "git reset olderrevid ; git push -f" = inconvenience people very much?=