From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: modern regexes in emacs Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:43:15 +0100 Message-ID: <3D5EA6AB-F0DA-4B66-8592-A111C906B3AE@acm.org> References: <20180616123704.7123f6d7@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87po0qs6re.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2c9m8yj.fsf@gnu.org> <17581DA9-7DCA-432E-A2E8-E5184DFA8B4B@acm.org> <20190215114728.0785e891@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20190215175405.GA5438@ACM> <83lg2gnbky.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="4084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Elias_M=C3=A5rtenson?= , perry@piermont.com, philippe.vaucher@gmail.com, jaygkamat@gmail.com, Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 19:43:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guiSV-0000vA-6u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:43:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44614 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guiSU-0004na-64 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guiSN-0004nV-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:43:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guiSM-0005WM-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail171c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.181]:35742 helo=mail92c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guiSK-0005TK-3b; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:43:26 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1550256200; bh=tmBzlxwK9D+Lxl9H6ikTisKTrvJV2emaNLmPdIF1D1c=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=e6B7gx7A+C4VJsqzuhmxsbqd0SaFPeuImopQUhipOWHulfm3z7QXniQWO9/D4nTBS Ts5p+NYQtZKwxAAQms1Uv58STd1tIOO07iLOD8vN2jUeyRvDbntHajWKJFgM43RTio HoybIE+zLWxbykMilP3H6MFBZgyUNGsvfyK/8wqs= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c83-251-8-17.bredband.comhem.se [83.251.8.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail92c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id x1FIhHqA028426; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:43:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83lg2gnbky.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0214.5C670848.0015, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=EN4oLWRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=NAHmi3I8mP0S/Y8gRKeQyA==:117 a=NAHmi3I8mP0S/Y8gRKeQyA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=na3yQJQGzo9KQRvtPJ4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 91.136.10.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233390 Archived-At: 15 feb. 2019 kl. 19.36 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >=20 > I proposed to have a separate set of functions that will accept PCRE > syntax. That would allow everyone to have what they want: you to use > the "classic" regexps, and those who want PCRE to have that. Where's > the problem with that? If I read the petitioners correctly, they want a global setting that = permits them to type a(b|c) instead of a\(b\|c\) in = isearch-forward-regexp and all other interactive commands. A separate = set of functions would be to hand them a box of replacement transistors = and some solder.