From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: <rms@gnu.org>, "'James Cloos'" <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Input method or help feature needed
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:33:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AD6375327F54A009DB477C24FB6796E@us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1PrGOT-0000Dr-1x@fencepost.gnu.org>
> But what key would Emacs want to use in place of the X11
> Multi_key key-symbol?
>
> Some f-key, perhaps? I am not sure what is typically available
> on the keyboard that Emacs does not use.
Is this a repeatable operation? Stronger: is it something that users will often
want to repeat by holding down the key?
If not, let's not waste a repeatable key on this. Let's save easily repeatable
keys for operations that users often repeat multiple times - e.g., incremental
modification or movement. Let them just hold down a key or chord to do that.
Put this on a prefix key. E.g., instead of putting it on `f7', put it on `C-x
f7'.
Or if this is used very often, so you do want something quick but you don't need
successive repetition, then put it on itself as a prefix key: `f7 f7'. Then you
can use the same prefix key for other, related commands. This wastes `f7' as a
repeatable key, but it is less wasteful than just binding `f7' to your command.
And if there is a related command that _is_ repeatable, then put that one on `f7
f7...' instead, and put commands such as the one you mention nearby - e.g., `f7
f8'. That's still quick.
To be able to (in effect) repeat a prefix key (`f7 f7 f7...'), where the action
starts on the second press, see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-08/msg01153.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 19:14 Input method or help feature needed Richard Stallman
2011-02-17 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-17 19:52 ` Stephen Berman
2011-02-17 20:24 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2011-02-18 10:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-18 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-18 20:00 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-17 22:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-02-18 21:24 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-19 7:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-19 8:01 ` David Kastrup
2011-02-19 8:37 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-20 0:30 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 0:29 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 3:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-20 21:01 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-18 21:24 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-17 19:31 ` Justin Lilly
2011-02-17 19:41 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-02-18 21:24 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-19 7:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-19 8:18 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-02-19 8:33 ` Miles Bader
2011-03-04 9:10 ` Kevin Rodgers
2011-02-17 20:26 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-17 22:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-02-18 0:09 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-18 5:13 ` Werner LEMBERG
2011-02-18 8:37 ` tomas
2011-02-18 8:41 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-18 11:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2011-02-20 8:27 ` tomas
2011-02-20 10:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-20 11:16 ` David Kastrup
2011-02-20 21:01 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 21:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-21 2:53 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-02-21 22:35 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-21 0:59 ` Kenichi Handa
2011-02-21 7:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-21 7:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2011-02-21 8:25 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-21 8:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-21 11:14 ` Kenichi Handa
2011-02-21 12:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-22 0:55 ` Kenichi Handa
2011-02-22 1:23 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-21 22:36 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-21 22:36 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-18 8:43 ` David Kastrup
2011-02-20 8:30 ` tomas
2011-02-20 10:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-18 21:25 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-19 7:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-20 0:29 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 7:43 ` James Cloos
2011-02-20 21:01 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 22:45 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2011-02-21 22:35 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-21 22:35 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-22 6:05 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2011-02-22 20:25 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-19 19:26 ` James Cloos
2011-02-20 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-20 21:33 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2011-02-21 22:36 ` Richard Stallman
2011-02-21 22:51 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-22 20:25 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-18 10:39 Андрей Парамонов
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AD6375327F54A009DB477C24FB6796E@us.oracle.com \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.