From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:27:57 +0300 Message-ID: <399c5831-4b74-5a84-4024-31fe3570b6ae@yandex.ru> References: <48066d7c-e4d3-acf5-fdcf-1aa9a108cb90@yandex.ru> <83bn5ttwul.fsf@gnu.org> <83shz4sdi0.fsf@gnu.org> <5a9b5719-ea84-89bc-c0c5-37692fafd23d@yandex.ru> <83inzypm94.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1q6plhb.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8lapkpt.fsf@gnu.org> <831t6mozrd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvp9nzl9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3ekm6na.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459870304 11387 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2016 15:31:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23179@debbugs.gnu.org, andlind@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 17:31:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anSwQ-00013s-AX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:30:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anSwP-0003sd-Pa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:30:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anSuf-00010f-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anSuc-00062E-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anSuc-00062A-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anSub-0000WJ-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23179.14598700871932 (code B ref 23179); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2016 15:28:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anStj-0000V6-D6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:34651) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anSth-0000UZ-9G for 23179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l6so28641060wml.1 for <23179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xj8pPz4EQWx/lC8EKrWl7klEJkNhXR7Dw+AsKDQDUtk=; b=aP34ObDSyqEoBWL00UBR+V1cWcy1dCmCrvpN5lMaO685FXn0tnP4VfRJhJz+EkgvVu 7uUlB1TQMXewacUQ/C0vp10z4qCg0s/LyFU0PV97ZjM+ZXTPaWc2TwaN7mqBo+zAZmoL 3GTX/xHVO/VLjqgkA8APQNOdHe0ySTrG8MbFyLVEy3JzjoNBqNSsg4+MHA8O8iBr0DMw mOnyXxZOjJsUGPapcj4Px++pD2zqGAsrlEm/lt6KuEmliubJYTu41V27UbblBKe9YdfG c0JrP1eTq24xVPzZOMvkvqkcZinWNqFS1U2TWfVYdJqaHYI1k7Uzz+3xcqwGO7R31G4F 8cuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xj8pPz4EQWx/lC8EKrWl7klEJkNhXR7Dw+AsKDQDUtk=; b=NF04717ID+aq8uts4xsqiP4m1IjindbwI0fVVg9O7kmhck7cMqymvUeZI+zmsX95Fj VbZea5QiOr7TOZJ4u/4OqLwfbvJTyGcGuNRAcxHajdIf1d3o54uhKrmaPe+RGQzrbHoy nuxDLtEhGMARtJn+gNnxAL9Ap+eCwRtGUx5I2Duk2hAfhhOlzQxlghVT3uTNKCTImG9S 7um7pZBJzLrkxL33JSPFVMYvDaWN10jyOTTu/MnzYOqCIw79IQtdmU94n5EPvSZnJh4Z ZbV4BI2O2Qvg9oBtCOUR5eDfNQLIfHuUH51598KxDqPxxoBgsJGe5IRfzldC8YjyOedG uMSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL34hjPSsQknvFS33vM32Pd3xhlVwnxkWJdwtayjvyZ3s9V7SXQ0O04eib94UuX9A== X-Received: by 10.28.19.140 with SMTP id 134mr19207551wmt.73.1459870079738; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e80sm20481109wma.1.2016.04.05.08.27.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:27:59 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <83r3ekm6na.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116066 Archived-At: On 04/05/2016 06:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I hope you are joking. Since when does anyone need to disclaim > responsibility for some code? And even if someone does, "git blame" > will blame the guilty parties right away. I mostly mean feature requests, bugs-which-are-really-missing-features, and so on. > Copying a function only to change a line or two sounds extreme to me. The idea is that the other UI should really be a new xref-show-xrefs-function, that's what that variable is there for (you can make it a defcustom). It would be better to avoid coupling the two UIs. > The point is to be able to tell people who, like Anders, don't want to > see the UI to use the option to get what they want, instead of arguing > with them trying to convince them that the UI is for their best. I'm just wondering if the new looks were a minor part of his complaint, and not seeing the first match quickly, a more significant one. Anyway, I don't mind. Here's a more technical concern: if you revisit the discussion http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20489, we've mentioned that next-error-find-buffer, like it's currently written, really wants the next-error-last-buffer to be visible. Otherwise, it's prone to switch to using next-error-function from some other, visible buffer.