From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Tracking down why emacsclient -c is so slow Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:54:40 +0200 Message-ID: <399CF4B9-9CAD-4E68-BB8F-09EF6A787E43@Web.DE> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250880925 28206 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2009 18:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs mailing list To: Alex Bennee Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 21 20:55:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MeZGf-0007f7-5E for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:55:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeZGe-0000O6-IB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MeZGK-0000Nx-Cv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:54:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MeZGE-0000K0-TD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:54:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35019 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeZGE-0000Jn-Kk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:46766) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MeZGE-0007R5-4P for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F971144910A; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [91.35.238.153] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1MeZGB-0004KP-00; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:54:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Sender: Peter_Dyballa@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+BFTnp0j/HJUECWxq8rxvcWZkHFohTLaCkDkdK sBvhe1Dv7d7r1Uoiy19ByR0TkAoaMRah7/cMEdzn7pwRIMHHDz vLDA4nM+3sKfuODJXhKA== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:67365 Archived-At: Am 21.08.2009 um 20:25 schrieb Alex Bennee: > Are there any other hooks run between after-make-frame-functions and > server-visit-hook I can hook to to see why it takes so long? Yes, they're called PCI, PCI-Express, AGP, and much more. Stick another and faster graphics card in such a slot and you'll less consumed to create a new frame. There is also the OS QNX. It's Photon windowing system is as fast as a usual photon. Maybe Plan 9 is as fast as Photon. -- Greetings Pete Theory and practice are the same, in theory, but, in practice, they are different.