From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ispell change Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:16:19 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <3995-Sat11May2002101619+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <1858-Fri10May2002195031+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021101514 9082 127.0.0.1 (11 May 2002 07:18:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 07:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, gerd@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 176R9G-0002MN-00 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 09:18:34 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 176RIj-0000jg-00 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 09:28:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 176R93-0006PU-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 03:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.17]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 176R8J-0006NW-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 03:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA) with ESMTP id BKE57061; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:17:26 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3828 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3828 > From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE > Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 22:15:01 +0200 > > Anyhow. There is a german dictionary which uses Latin-1 and I think > we need a variant for Latin-9. Yes, I agree.