From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15273: 24.3.50; Combining character sequences are displayed weirdly Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 15:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: <36AC5933-7C41-4768-9CC5-DF71323BC780@swipnet.se> References: <9243D0C8-83F9-40B4-8F2C-37517A1F6BCC@swipnet.se> <8338pjnqfm.fsf@gnu.org> <831u53npuy.fsf@gnu.org> <7977F745-C1B8-44AD-9710-3CE9567C5338@swipnet.se> <83zjrrm9tc.fsf@gnu.org> <5B85556B-72FB-49DB-96F8-A38939746260@swipnet.se> <83r4d2mpi2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vc2ee9io.fsf@igel.home> <83ppsmmml5.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjrqkkun.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppslks82.fsf@gnu.org> <80DE2CE4-1702-4555-B336-D11A281C44E9@swipnet.se> <83li39kqru.fsf@gnu.org> <1737AA30-1186-40EF-A225-1AFA1A73622B@swipnet.se> <83k3itkq6c.fsf@gnu.org> <83ioydkosp.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh91kl4r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378561583 5467 80.91.229.3 (7 Sep 2013 13:46:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, 15273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 07 15:46:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIq9-0005hv-4L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:46:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIq8-0006Kd-Qa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:46:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIq0-0006FB-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIpv-0006OH-6N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIpv-0006OD-33 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIpt-0003Pf-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15273.137856150613042 (code B ref 15273); Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2013 13:45:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIoy-0003OG-NF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.bdtv.se ([176.10.222.34]:59538) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VIIop-0003NV-1O for 15273@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:44:59 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 15301 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2013 13:44:52 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-57.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.57) by mail01.bdtv.se with ESMTPA; 7 Sep 2013 13:44:52 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (unknown [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF2761A009A; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:44:52 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83eh91kl4r.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78109 Archived-At: Hello. 7 sep 2013 kl. 11:59 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >> From: Jan Dj=E4rv >> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 10:54:58 +0200 >> Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, >> 15273@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >> Except the larger bug that Emacs does not handle combining characters = correctly in the general case, i.e. not combining the ! and the triangle = on X11 and W32 (and Mac port). >=20 > Is there any application out there that does combine these 2 > characters, with any font? If not, perhaps it's not an Emacs issue > after all. Yes, the builtin TextEdit application does it. >=20 > E.g., Code2000, which is really good, produces a composed character > for a followed by u+20d0, but not for a followed by u+20e4. You can > experiment with other combining diacriticals from that Unicode block, > and you will see that some of them combine, while others do not. >=20 > If the fonts do not tell us to combine characters, the only way to do > that is to provide an Emacs composition rule for those characters. >=20 >> And if it is a bug in the NS font driver, that is also an Emacs = issue. There must be one, either metrics should be corrected or the NS = font driver should be modified to behave in the same (incorrect) way as = the other platforms. >=20 > If you mean the incorrect display of the lone u+20e4, then I just > installed the STIX fonts (from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/stixfonts/files/?source=3Dnavbar) on = my > Windows box, and didn't see any problems as originally reported here. > Can you install the latest STIX fonts and try with that on NS? If the > problem persists, then I agree that nsfont.m is probably the culprit. The behaviour iis the same with that STIX version as it is with the OSX = supplied STIX version. Jan D.