Re: URL + efs confusion

["Davis Herring" <herring@lanl.gov>]

> I can't think of any situations where somebody would knowingly create a
> URL with the Emacs /foo:/-syntax.  It's possible that somebody has
> created Emacs-specific HTML that uses this, but it seems rather
> unlikely.

If it did, it would be incorrect to give such a URL a file: scheme,
because it's not a file name.  "/foo:/bar" ought to be emacs://foo/bar or
perhaps emacs://ftp/foo/bar (taking the access mode to be the authority; I
don't remember if you can stack access modes).

Davis

-- 
This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.