footnote renumber bug?

footnote renumber bug?

[Andreas Roehler]

Hi,

when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1],  [fn:3] and [fn:2].

Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?

Thanks


Andreas

;;;;;;;;;;;;

Below the test-case:


* Erinnerung

* Eins
  asdasdf asdfsdfa  [fn:1]

** Zwei
   asdfsdf [fn:3]

*** TODO Im Auge behalten                                            :neutag:
    [fn:2]


* Footnotes

[fn:1] asdfasdf

[fn:2] asdf dddd

[fn:3]

Re: footnote renumber bug?

[Giovanni Ridolfi]

-- Gio 29/10/09, Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de> ha scritto:
> when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
> it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1],  [fn:3] and
> [fn:2].
> 
> Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
> be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?

It's a *feature*!.
did you activate the corresponding variable?

Manual:
"Automatic sorting after each insertion/deletion 
can be configured using the 
variable `org-footnote-auto-adjust'."

hth
Giovanni 

Re: footnote renumber bug?

[Andreas Röhler]

Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> -- Gio 29/10/09, Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de> ha scritto:
>> when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
>> it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1],  [fn:3] and
>> [fn:2].
>>
>> Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
>> be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?
> 
> It's a *feature*!.
> did you activate the corresponding variable?
> 
> Manual:
> "Automatic sorting after each insertion/deletion 
> can be configured using the 
> variable `org-footnote-auto-adjust'."
> 
> hth
> Giovanni 
> 
> 

It did. Thanks!

Andreas