From: Brian Leung via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 49632@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Subject: bug#49632: [PATCH] Ensure that M-x gdb populates gud-repeat-map
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:51:45 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <343742107.2068902.1626706305280@ichabod.co-bxl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eebupi5k.fsf@gnus.org>
> But I don't quite understand why gud-repeat-map is populated in the
> normal way -- i.e., in `gud-repeat-map' so that users can
> redefine/override entries as usual.
I think it is presently done this way because things like M-x gdb, M-x pdb, etc. all use their own debugger commands, so we need to re-bind exactly the right ones each time. For example, in M-x perldb, gud-finish, gud-up, and gud-down are all commented out even though gdb clearly supports those functions.
> ----------------------------------------
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Sent: Mon Jul 19 15:06:31 CEST 2021
> To: Brian Leung <leungbk@mailfence.com>
> Cc: <49632@debbugs.gnu.org>, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Subject: Re: bug#49632: [PATCH] Ensure that M-x gdb populates gud-repeat-map
>
>
> Brian Leung <leungbk@mailfence.com> writes:
>
> > * lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el (gdb): Populate gud-repeat-map. This is
> > copied from the gud-gdb command.
>
> Instead of copying the code, perhaps it should be separated out into its
> own function and then called from both places?
>
> But I don't quite understand why gud-repeat-map is populated in the
> normal way -- i.e., in `gud-repeat-map' so that users can
> redefine/override entries as usual.
>
> Juri?
>
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--
Sent with https://mailfence.com
Secure and private email
--
Mailfence.com
Private and secure email
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 3:37 bug#49632: [PATCH] Ensure that M-x gdb populates gud-repeat-map Brian Leung
2021-07-19 13:06 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-19 13:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-19 14:57 ` Brian Leung
2021-07-19 16:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-19 21:53 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-19 14:51 ` Brian Leung via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2021-07-19 15:37 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-19 15:52 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-24 3:33 ` Brian Leung
2021-07-25 6:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-25 20:53 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-25 21:28 ` Brian Leung
2021-07-26 22:48 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-27 4:09 ` Brian Leung
2021-07-27 6:46 ` Brian Leung
2021-07-27 21:15 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-28 11:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-28 16:23 ` Juri Linkov
2021-07-28 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=343742107.2068902.1626706305280@ichabod.co-bxl \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=49632@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=leungbk@mailfence.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.