From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Possible defvar bug Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:15:35 -0800 Message-ID: <340816FB6EB446BFBBCCCA6551E851E9@us.oracle.com> References: <87d2vxr8h6.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87obfhy8zc.fsf@gmail.com> <20130218150954.GA4583@acm.acm> <8738wty6hz.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361204157 8602 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2013 16:15:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:15:57 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Thierry Volpiatto'" , Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 17:16:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7TO0-0006jd-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:16:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53399 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7TNg-0002XL-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7TNd-0002Wu-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:15:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7TNV-0004Qy-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:37652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7TNV-0004Qq-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:15:41 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r1IGFcGZ025314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:15:39 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1IGFbbq012696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:15:38 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1IGFahJ024944; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:15:36 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:15:36 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <8738wty6hz.fsf@gmail.com> Thread-Index: Ac4N7nNpDY2469b/RG62Fl7FVgKTgwABAR0A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157134 Archived-At: > See also documentation of `require' which should not be used inside > `let' bindings for same reasons. Hm. What doc of `require' mentions this? I looked at the doc string and (elisp) `Named Features', but I didn't notice anything about this. I hope that the doc for this, wherever it might be, is more specific than what you said, because I cannot imagine that such a blanket statement is correct. Presumably, any potential problem would depend on what variables the `let' binds?