From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze and Tramp? Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 08:20:24 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3405-Mon03May2004082023+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <87zn8qlleb.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083562112 18084 80.91.224.253 (3 May 2004 05:28:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 05:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 07:28:22 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKW06-0005g2-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKW06-0008DM-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKVy6-0002nJ-0l for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKVxz-0002kh-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKVxT-0002N9-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BKVvR-0001lN-61; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKVt3-0007b5-EA; Mon, 03 May 2004 01:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.149.187]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CUV08709; Mon, 3 May 2004 08:20:32 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on 02 May 2004 21:19:39 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22575 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22575 > From: David Kastrup > Date: 02 May 2004 21:19:39 +0200 > > Considering the additional work of maintaining a separate > back-ported branch that would have to be created separately, and > considering the relative youth of the feature freeze and the number > of things that have just gotten in, I'd say in this case put it in > and maintain the stable branch from this point on. I second that.