From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: <33ee7805-b5ee-ce62-042f-d980184e327e@yandex.ru> References: <83o7sby8yk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 11:48:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xPB-0001xS-OY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:48:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOm-0004cH-PM; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOl-0004bb-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:48:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOk-0005Do-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOk-000628-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.167066926823115 (code B ref 59935); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 10:47:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOW-00060j-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:47:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:43942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3xOU-000606-Ka for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 05:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k22-20020a05600c1c9600b003d1ee3a6289so1565023wms.2 for <59935@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:47:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jh/u80AIYFpn9phWIm/nEScxDpQDDADFf3xPLJ28+CI=; b=DA4h2RRzdQnOwnpnjJ/2veRkK3zOx8QVoAhwCZwEyv7WYrzfLhMgFVrTcLC6EE7XLs G/Mgt1IvJIvO5KCqdi5OjF/x6/TZZP1G66SUqkFZCxZSrFeKBGGwYxCsq+mtK9cnWJjU 2hICmIrqIqPCRgbtr86lLp+2hzRj4NOB5VZouWoy+jIf4b9l01qiP6Cdfyfkg/y/OfCP Sa2CDTixoAhDlsK6MkH3LkxBo+78Kz/aMp8guKa01mUOd/ubmdOew2U4gBcZ/p16FpGm KD+WELDMA7o8FQcLzee84qbVIuTM8BjWSc+H66v6vCnEyvI563etLWkByPFlekfDIqXM LeIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jh/u80AIYFpn9phWIm/nEScxDpQDDADFf3xPLJ28+CI=; b=1tgmhu181MNcOPx0e1OPtNx83S2YpF5WtukNFFiia4k0n7t/6bC3UJWwTR0UEeIm2S r7Kxw23kDhcyry0wmZ/C7QtwA2VvPUfFYv9U6dsfkbPndVSRb85aCf9/nCyuvmfvyAdo IcQlbCGXdfwsts9PnYGXMIdF7MPFue99KfRHTxrMsYquX6nfcQQnhi09Tq8/+i/Q4xIA wCd4eyKBUqldLlcV94MAb9ycs7Rd5piHPXuV1YngoYR2QGN/aZmqCwmkYyBjEB0pPoaX X4VxOMnAFI6HFFtaq4TIB5faWmSWKYFNhoEVtMYgkubDRFkYMPTSDnRGsQASa+JFaBsV Jg/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmez0K2DirZUPls4dJaV5sp9eL4B7XqZp5TOB1lZkfwhGAhIScm N6P8lWL5EUWFGQk7uozJzR8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5hhqsUDKB6DB0sh/4o7vT9WVXl4wF0RZu1cxZtszStqNQdR6cjvSvBOvFoY4EM1oKlnvOMlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7c18:0:b0:3cf:a6d9:7b3c with SMTP id x24-20020a1c7c18000000b003cfa6d97b3cmr7125959wmc.21.1670669260544; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:47:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c66-20020a1c3545000000b003d09150b339sm2485248wma.20.2022.12.10.02.47.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:47:39 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83o7sby8yk.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250503 Archived-At: On 10/12/2022 10:11, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm not following. Are you saying that the problem is that the > FILTER-PREDICATE argument to list-buffers-noselect calls > project-buffers for each buffer? Yes. > If so, I don't understand why a > trivial change to project-list-buffers could not call project-buffers > just once, and then reuse the value in the call to > list-buffers-noselect both as the BUFFER-LIST argument and (if needed) > in the FILTER-PREDICATE argument, using memq. If we just do that, pressing 'g' will only show the buffers that belonged to the project when project-list-buffers was called. And not necessarily the *current* list of project buffers. The previously attached patches solved that problem.