From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: egnarts-ms Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding questions Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33849639.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <33827449.post@talk.nabble.com> <87vcjylmfl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337104480 14840 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2012 17:54:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 19:54:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SULxH-0002Qn-KM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 19:54:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SULxG-0004Ns-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:54:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SULxD-0004Mh-R8 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SULxC-0005JD-3h for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:54:35 -0400 Original-Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:37043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SULxB-0005Hs-VQ for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:54:34 -0400 Original-Received: from telerig.nabble.com ([192.168.236.162]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SULx4-0004HX-Je for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 10:54:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87vcjylmfl.fsf@gnu.org> X-Nabble-From: egnartsms@gmail.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 216.139.236.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150504 Archived-At: Johan Bockg=C3=A5rd-4 wrote: >=20 > Also, it reminded my of this: >=20 > (setq lexical-binding t) >=20 > (let ((t 0)) t) =3D> error >=20 > (let ((nil 0)) nil) =3D> 0 >=20 Thanks Johan, a very good observation.. I don't think this is a very seriou= s bug, but nevertheless. Quite an inconsistent behavior. --=20 View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/lexical-binding-questio= ns-tp33799305p33849639.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.