From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68373: 29.1; Bug in MH-E's support for using openssl to generate the checksum Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 15:58:15 -0800 Message-ID: <32941.1705276695@alto> References: <7370.1704908052@lux.lbt.ibpc.fr> <26781.1705271920@alto> <69285.1705273222@lux.lbt.ibpc.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3267"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68373@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marc Baaden Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 00:59:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPANx-0000jD-Fs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:59:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPANb-0007Nk-Lb; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPANa-0007Nc-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPANa-0000Hx-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPANZ-0002R8-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 23:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68373 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68373-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68373.17052767049312 (code B ref 68373); Sun, 14 Jan 2024 23:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68373) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2024 23:58:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPAMx-0002Q8-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:56384 ident=root) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPAMw-0002Py-6n for 68373@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from alto (135-180-173-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.173.181] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 40ENwF7L044989 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Jan 2024 15:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kupfer@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host 135-180-173-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [135.180.173.181] (may be forged) claimed to be alto In-reply-to: <69285.1705273222@lux.lbt.ibpc.fr> Comments: In-reply-to Marc Baaden message dated "Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:22 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; Emacs 29.1.90 Content-ID: <32940.1705276695.1@alto> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278242 Archived-At: Marc Baaden wrote: > Sure. Concerning MacOS, actually now I am on 12 because when my new > harddisk replacement (sort of memory stick) arrived, it was not > recognized by OS Catalina v10 and I was forced to upgrade. Okay. > I hope this will not mess up the bug follow-up. It depends. :-) If you hide the md5sum binary, can you still reproduce the failure? thanks, mike