From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "A. Soare" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New paren matching feature request Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:16:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3275381.334041233368215113.JavaMail.www@wwinf4610> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233368236 27997 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2009 02:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Stefan Monnier , "Richard Stallman [rms]" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 31 03:18:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LT5RB-00021L-EP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT5Ps-0000Ir-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT5Po-0000ID-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT5Pn-0000HS-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42897 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT5Pn-0000HP-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp1.voila.fr ([193.252.22.174]:63593) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LT5Pj-0005XT-Pv; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:16:56 -0500 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4013.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 271E7700008C; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:16:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from wwinf4610 (wwinf4610 [10.232.13.53]) by mwinf4013.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1DDBC7000083; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:16:55 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20090131021655122.1DDBC7000083@mwinf4013.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [92.82.181.103] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~||~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108435 Archived-At: It's a question of belief to decide whether the code of indetation as local= -parsing or as a sum is better; I ask myself what is the process of forming= of the belief. In the last past 20 years at least, in the Museums of Egypt the great finge= r from the hands of the statues dissapeared and continue so. The experts in= religious sectes asked themselves why. They found out the answer: the egyp= tians believe that the soul get out from the statues and can be dangerous. = They believe that it can hurt peuple with his hands. =C2=A7 Today during the lunch I made an exeperiment at the restaurant: I asked somebody whether a hand without the great finger can hurt somebody.= He said: "Yes, quite so!". He was right. Then I took a knife and hit the t= able with its top. (without using the great finger). And I saw that the han= d without the great finger can be dangerous. Why the egyptians believe such a thing? =20 > Message du 31/01/09 =C3=A0 02h39 > De : "Stefan Monnier" > A : rms@gnu.org > Copie =C3=A0 : alinsoar@voila.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Objet : Re: New paren matching feature request >=20 >=20 > > I have a feeling that the right way to do this kind of colorization > > is through Font Lock mode, and that the hardest part of the job > > is hooking it up to the structure of jit-lock. >=20 > I agree and I also think that Alin's right in that the best way to do it > is via parse-partial-sexp (suitably enhanced if/as needed). > Font-lock-mode already uses parse-partial-sexp to do > comment&string highlighting. >=20 >=20 > Stefan >=20 >=20 ____________________________________________________ =C3=89coutez en un clic votre musique pr=C3=A9f=C3=A9r=C3=A9e et d=C3=A9cou= vrez de nouveaux titres en affinit=C3=A9 avec vos go=C3=BBts sur http://mus= iline.voila.fr=20