From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50743: Emacsclient not tested vs. Local Variables prompt Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 19:48:18 -0700 Message-ID: <32074.1632624498@alto> References: <8735pwpdrm.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13703"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 50743@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 26 04:49:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKEU-0003Pb-3i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 04:49:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41484 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKES-00016C-6O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKDu-00012H-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKDu-0003A1-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKDu-0007MN-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 02:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 50743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50743.163262450828248 (code B ref 50743); Sun, 26 Sep 2021 02:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2021 02:48:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKDM-0007LX-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:11599 ident=root) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUKDK-0007LO-OR for 50743@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:48:27 -0400 Original-Received: from alto (96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 18Q2mJfm012450 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 19:48:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host 96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133] claimed to be alto In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:34:11 +1300." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215544 Archived-At: Phil Sainty wrote: > The key appears to be whether or not we're using a pre-existing > client frame. If a new frame is created, the problem does not > occur (for me). If we're switching to a pre-existing frame, then > I can reproduce the problem. Yes, that matches what I'm seeing. mike