From: Phil Hagelberg <phil@hagelb.org>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: Nikolaj Schumacher <me@nschum.de>,
web@shellarchive.co.uk, Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>,
ohler+emacs@fastmail.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
rubikitch <rubikitch@ruby-lang.org>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: unit test framework
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:00:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31edf1081003191200k7f76711eyc753e6544bbb7a9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e01d8a51003180756l43c0c2dbp8e59a66a1b472027@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Lennart Borgman
<lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> I asked long ago for a comparision on EmacsWiki:
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/UnitTesting
>
> However there have not been any interest in that. If have cc:ed the
> unit test framework authors, maybe they want to say something.
>
> I am not sure which of them have signed papers:
>
> ert: Christian Ohler
> elunit: Phil Hagelberg
> elk-test: Nikolaj Schumacher
> etest: Phil Jackson
> el-mock: rubikitch
elunit is deprecated in favour of ert, so it should not be considered
for inclusion. When I was investigating the options (~2 years ago),
ert was the clear winner, though I don't remember the details clearly.
Mostly it had to do with having the clearest failure reports. Beyond
that there were not a lot of differences; unit testing is a pretty
straightforward task.
Things may have changed since then.
-Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 7:39 unit test framework Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-18 9:31 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-18 10:07 ` Leo
2010-03-18 10:23 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-18 11:25 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-18 14:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-18 14:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-19 0:16 ` rubikitch
2010-03-19 19:00 ` Phil Hagelberg [this message]
2010-03-20 11:01 ` Nikolaj Schumacher
2010-03-23 9:02 ` joakim
2010-03-23 13:15 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-24 3:03 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-23 14:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-04-13 10:32 ` joakim
2010-06-12 6:06 ` Christian Ohler
2010-06-12 13:48 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-14 11:24 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-07-23 21:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-23 10:15 ` Philip Jackson
2010-06-27 18:50 ` Philip Jackson
2010-07-09 13:43 ` Christian Ohler
2010-07-09 23:01 ` Glenn Morris
2010-07-10 1:12 ` Christian Ohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31edf1081003191200k7f76711eyc753e6544bbb7a9c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=phil@hagelb.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=me@nschum.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=ohler+emacs@fastmail.net \
--cc=rubikitch@ruby-lang.org \
--cc=web@shellarchive.co.uk \
--cc=yamato@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.