From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of LISP code Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <31279316.113871175847628387.JavaMail.www@wwinf4202> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175847757 21247 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2007 08:22:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 10:22:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZjgh-0002eD-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:20:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZjk8-0000Ra-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZjjv-0000P0-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZjjt-0000Km-Lu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZjjs-0000Jd-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp3.voila.fr ([193.252.22.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HZjgO-0000gp-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:20:33 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4203.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6E72E1C0007E; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4202 (wwinf4202 [10.232.2.29]) by mwinf4203.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 619E51C000BC; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:20:28 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070406082028399.619E51C000BC@mwinf4203.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69112 Archived-At: > > When we put ;;; the indent of the comment must not change. > > And who said so? > AFAIK, the only rule about ";;;" is that they should be "indented" to > column 0, which in the present case is impossible. Hoops ! I do not know. Will somebody explain me how do you want these comments to show in future? (example and explanations with all line commented and also ;;; comment at the end of the line). Thanks!