From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 16:11:39 -0400 Message-ID: <310a23eb-8c5f-2405-5e55-3ebb97526489@live.com> References: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> <49a934d2-fd0b-4b5d-bd77-379d0d3f95fc@default> <91ebc787-acba-55b5-0129-221c5359736d@live.com> <2bfebc61-6c10-4463-bc1d-b4d1ce76c950@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jEEJwU4OcI2nvMPwK7a2qScQsB0lStSn0" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495051931 31590 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 20:12:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:12:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 To: Drew Adams , 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 22:12:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ik-00086r-9w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:12:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ip-00074P-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ik-00070j-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ig-0004cu-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5If-0004co-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5If-0006Sf-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26959.149505191924829 (code B ref 26959); Wed, 17 May 2017 20:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2017 20:11:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51366 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ic-0006SN-Cr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:53476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ia-0006SA-Lp for 26959@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.26.2.123] ([18.26.2.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lnjkl-1ddGyz1NHj-00hsIy; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:11:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2bfebc61-6c10-4463-bc1d-b4d1ce76c950@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CO8XaQI9hqueAY1U5AF/Cd6mAmfqvH5TuHUGJGye5wiYB93XngO OCKTkOFqXMk/fmyjFvuOD09pHyRSbj2c0RRLcinqeeacfZ/AD2Mq/DWTael0HMp8XXBiTPR aP2vZfcCyI/nWA/MxI+7uS1iMGHOhZp4fO1akV/IzVxloI+9IC1+O16pq7PNPHK9GnOromd 0ZSZ10qNTJnCsQ/I2siUg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tPEHRsIwfV8=:xA+YDVqlcyFdTRO+Wk5DqW EgWti/nRpYIDgnDxLIwv3WF+DsuxdJC1WTUQivTL/Huxa31hni9hVQBBhFQUp9PTdmfaEGlSs ZYcqAymuWdONyKzGJPWHD+LC4eXWt4NHLIMl0eE2Wb7aDikjtk+UIzfDYMvwONNvD2bLPDcHB r2Ju92AJuixufxY8lWJBuLM8FeCfA48MZwmvi4zuHVd56WarBr8AQuZXysKzdFnRqm0PbyjjZ rNVnIQW+2HXsQtlMeP6Ib0mRIcVpo1xR3mc4LUAvKa6tAYiJCbBBBlQBk+PhIu/n/Q2OCVfgV /Y7TK9kZ4mdFcQVW5RssdT8YyS9MDsq+We+6z4MVeatjKyykpSyAGe0b+YjenoKLppGF3Y0qS 5ZYsTOzwc6DsvIO00n49484/nT84CYyfARU5vnjJTqvkxdstCQoVXKCv4Po9e6HDshutr/+VN EPwfOgVMErXzHQ2uOxah89PKlFFn8M+aj6uAdfulM8Srxzfspq/totIlM9Q4esUBKh5MREqkF WAmdN6wwSfR8AfoidWAtA1a/yXNvf6y9GYJxrx0u5qeb4RoTqJd2egppjRcooKSkGDlfQGbLS H0Oakg93OpILJJQBJnleKhGrLqtU2FJEh130XUduW3QKh0hXibXZQdBCH7MApKkyX2Q5Q10y2 AA8IEciTfwWUFmvkWpQREWl2LyPs+ZQ7uh2+AYdeDBZnnJM8C0coVJ6MHPD5DUlu5dQk= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132580 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jEEJwU4OcI2nvMPwK7a2qScQsB0lStSn0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PflT3sWFmdwCudipcXA5mIVijaVHwFENB"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Drew Adams , 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <310a23eb-8c5f-2405-5e55-3ebb97526489@live.com> Subject: Re: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines References: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> <49a934d2-fd0b-4b5d-bd77-379d0d3f95fc@default> <91ebc787-acba-55b5-0129-221c5359736d@live.com> <2bfebc61-6c10-4463-bc1d-b4d1ce76c950@default> In-Reply-To: <2bfebc61-6c10-4463-bc1d-b4d1ce76c950@default> --PflT3sWFmdwCudipcXA5mIVijaVHwFENB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-05-17 15:48, Drew Adams wrote: > Like it or not, people get used to existing behaviors, and people > write code that expects that behavior. I don't understand how Lisp code can depend on this behavior. Can you cla= rify? --PflT3sWFmdwCudipcXA5mIVijaVHwFENB-- --jEEJwU4OcI2nvMPwK7a2qScQsB0lStSn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZHK57AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjMfoP/AhtfYQI1CaoB5130wMpHnQv MeqVijPE12WxG+rjqU61Rt8Bll7zyrGlZZ6AfbSQIdZI/VU0LjdiAPwmkgnB8zCR X6tAgTOLxlYDrskAjKL4hKdGR0yy1LjVzQAgHcMAGbbnKQZ5TVZLfAW51HM+ALHL CCNcIVjB4qwDExG2x5nNpBlTU/AnzHVpMKIPHhKymPwCuUE69Rpfodw1z99oiamM Ckuy3I8pApMzNDZHElib5b3x6wdCWfD7dntnftM42x0jt8630N2oYK+PPKEVcYFE z9bROlBJgGLJtbQVkn7vtHdfRXLJdoZG62tl0CCOJeY7ROaEcmRGbU+jKnVBzgb+ muDRFbj4zwkR4uXsOQrgrRHDiN2Zz/MrXPy7NftY+LXZWe3ai+cRHSklzNFpVerg Mkjhi3muHmnqJWz+EH4Wz85OnSdySfSIe/MK7EDCpkNhutdlfy9NzmB2QuZzmsAR 5NHNESvRakwUD1W06AVblsbY9BPHzHImht1LyQap5rCR6JycZNn1Jt95Hix1SiKW vcRXBetjI1UalEFu1gPeB17cNaLJqRsUVIIrcjYWEME1QvjmLe0996qefrigpp5j 9b7WDstmY2gvolRQuCvGQpyjYzpvvePi+5d0eS1SSaunNMOTatwhYh7DNc5lgZBv Jnz9L7Z6g1CUVN/mzcBH =hCki -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jEEJwU4OcI2nvMPwK7a2qScQsB0lStSn0--