all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, jbasrai@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Emacs inventing system documentation
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:30:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3099-Fri20Feb2004193047+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873c968uzv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Fri,  19 Feb 2004 23:57:22 +0200)

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2004 23:57:22 +0200
> 
> This code runs before the man page is formatted and displayed, and
> we don't know where the page will actually be displayed, so both
> frame-width and window-width are incorrect.  But still window-width
> is better than frame-width, because it produces more correct results
> in one situation and don't make it worse in another.

``More correct'' might not be good enough: it could be better for the
situations you tried, but we cannot guarantee it is always better.
That's why it is IMHO wrong to use incorrect methods.

So I think we should come up with a different approach, one that
guarantees that the screen width passed to `man' is the correct one.
Could you please try to think about such a different solution?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-20 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1145.1074773531.928.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-01-22 18:31 ` Emacs inventing system documentation Kevin Rodgers
2004-01-22 23:37 ` LEE Sau Dan
2004-01-23 18:24   ` Richard Stallman
2004-02-18 21:02     ` Juri Linkov
2004-02-19  6:03       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-19 21:57         ` Juri Linkov
2004-02-20 17:30           ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
     [not found]   ` <mailman.1230.1074882368.928.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-01-24  3:35     ` David Kastrup
     [not found] ` <mailman.1160.1074796607.928.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2004-01-23 22:29   ` LEE Sau Dan
2004-01-22 12:00 Reuben Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3099-Fri20Feb2004193047+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@elta.co.il \
    --cc=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=jbasrai@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.