From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey C Honig" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: 23.1: Is delete-windows-on supposed to change the current buffer? Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:00 -0400 Message-ID: <30354.1248991980@schlepp.honig.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248998044 31315 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2009 23:54:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:54:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 31 01:53:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MWfRc-0003Xh-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:53:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWfRc-0004Ns-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWds9-0007fl-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWds4-0007bw-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58080 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWds4-0007bt-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from firewall.honig.net ([66.152.121.24]:48243) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWds3-0003x1-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from schlepp.honig.net (shlepp.HONIG.NET [172.25.29.34]) by firewall.honig.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-8ubuntu1) with ESMTP id n6UMD16j015114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from schlepp.honig.net (schlepp.honig.net [127.0.0.1]) by schlepp.honig.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-4) with ESMTP id n6UMD0g6030356 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:13:01 -0400 X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 23.1.1 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXMnHK1jHX257A2GQY+ AQD2yp+TalXrsYfLpNnfAAACHUlEQVR4nG3TwYrbMBAG4NFCrKu1UO+1FZhc1zioD+DSc2oY fLUJq16VgDKv31+W5aTtKoFl9WVGM2OZfvy/Ons2hsp/w+kzGPq0CrgHpO1HhBv/gkfIzx2G 3nn/OfiaQKchn3gr0LtaJJDfzhledpi1YEEyvG7QO5LIiKkua8zw8nWDRQszRPm1gHL44Gbh 0UJCc1mBc8TgSdjalqeg1vPdmKH3Om5AHiFDZ48FtgihBqf4jxX6k1sQkRZANZduGjP0gLRt J8JS/rdFtFrB5FR09zNRMz9AEWlrj/FIwagn6Crv52gnTGtStVp2mCvM9jAKfoyCpXqKaMjc ONRX4jNxNUIyNJWfOQqJAMYmAWVoMEVNMkk8a/a3Au9UaQkIQIdBi99TfQ9BYgBxix7F7fCO fQ5x0jE1Hx7gzjoiPb7IJdcVwgoBgFSoCnB3tkBPAKUpPS+enqFGUUYTmTe2XBUwBsOVatE6 qDcM495t4DFBZoVnMlF8BqRyI58rQan8L9xaDoSEuERttezl9v2rZUFl+FhufJINPvCUJM1W J/Bfdug4YD+2ARUAzGivGRxjC90F3Z4BixkLHEKdrrU6MG4poFYZljrgNtg0YswAnS0FFqmj bSfBqyDXBCb3YZb05qQFegKPP7ilyIWDRuWXxuS7q4w5IMK2ggZbkxfhjb0a85Y6TEH2WwG3 pNHXSB/TkKwpgHOQymB33f9V4A+X8QoMXFv/KAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:53:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113434 Archived-At: I'm debugging a problem with mh-e with 23.1. In particular (mh-yank-cur-msg) in lisp/mh-e/mh-letter.el. In 23.1, unlike prior releases, this sequence changes the current buffer: (if mh-delete-yanked-msg-window-flag (delete-windows-on mh-show-buffer))) Is this change in behavior expected so that we should fix mh-e? Or is this a bug in emacs 23.1 that I should report? Thanks (=E8=B0=A2=E8=B0=A2). Jeff --=20 Jeffrey C. Honig http://www.honig.net/jch GnuPG ID:14E29E13