From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33344: 26.1; doc-view bounding-box recognition doesn't work on path names with spaces Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:12:40 -0500 Message-ID: <2pmuqcalt3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <2721782.Y6SdopJXAr@calvin> <9ein120yhb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83o9as9a6x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542132784 24432 195.159.176.226 (13 Nov 2018 18:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:13:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: 33344@debbugs.gnu.org, trent2@web.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 13 19:12:59 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdBL-0006C5-CP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:12:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdDR-0003ET-Fe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdDL-0003DU-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdCM-0000QJ-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdCM-0000QD-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdCM-0005aC-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <2721782.Y6SdopJXAr@calvin> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33344.154213278221376 (code B ref 33344); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2018 18:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdBN-0005Yf-Pm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdBL-0005YK-UV for 33344@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:13:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdBF-0008E1-UP for 33344@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdB7-0007zW-A2; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gMdB3-0003Q0-Ah; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:12:41 -0500 X-Spook: Vince Foster RSA Bosnia red noise Leuken-Baden Plane pink X-Ran: )5!Ix@;dN4x1T2u[iJkAP*nZg List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152350 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks, but call-process won't DTRT if the default-directory is > remote, would it? s/call-process/process-file then > And I wonder how many more subtle incompatibilities will such a change > cause. All that because we need to run a single string through > shell-quote-argument (and not just enclose it in double quotes)? Is > it really worth it? External processes should not be called through a shell unless they really need that, and I see no evidence for that here.