From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 03:39:14 +0300 Message-ID: <2f89fe0a-9ada-6b30-b8f6-2dec5bbe1bd6@yandex.ru> References: <87a7ktqqx7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9215183d-0a44-88b5-5b3c-d0da31f749ad@yandex.ru> <878t02egph.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <93c0f44f-012c-4963-faf3-e4185bc3aee0@yandex.ru> <877eflxov0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546562292 27684 195.159.176.226 (4 Jan 2019 00:38:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:38:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 Cc: 33870@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 04 01:38:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDV1-00075q-RZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 01:38:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDX8-00051R-PL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDX1-00050F-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDWv-00063g-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDWs-00060v-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDWs-0007fv-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33870.154656236629453 (code B ref 33870); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2019 00:39:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46103 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDWG-0007ew-Db for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:32830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfDWE-0007eg-8Q for 33870@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:39:22 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id i26so24414894lfc.0 for <33870@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:39:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3vsTlCjyCxYAaPUZ8geLFGLbDZnfVeNdGFHbV44KO30=; b=EaS+g1pIC+3p6CUHg79gbEmDEvV1WTKncq3RW3FxG/Lhr0K6I3L/2YP0M0/bOp09h/ 7oI4AwnW28lrqN5qOLkWi7H7stl2zYb+X+qBAHQnYPmprjuaGALh0O+5g/KYdXAB3Q85 Fi3KMAm5X5nFdYQcgxGi3h3ERdPr88V6kIS3YinMPb21HdaBEGMnHnu7sCEPEVBDiHfW FJLIrqHCjt/bI0C31q60fIhkW5KiYpqyZWi2tWbAocJt0HjmDnjFtunpK74gDxWrDjh/ /bjDC184lclSfp5beKcdgY9HsqA9GWElRT1n3AsLZ556i9K0xQNU9dyaFpYybu/JmP6C hLuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3vsTlCjyCxYAaPUZ8geLFGLbDZnfVeNdGFHbV44KO30=; b=GJHrLh2xRhM5vh34yvw7KZCd22h81R7qJ05FYBE93Otl7vrb0YGedZ+AcF67wvcL16 DcmcUlbJzk1qzBGwKJorwtll1K9cpjwNe7SUK2Mc7m+8Iv8la0xyw6KfIqCjjh4A4emI D0VaLppj7O1P3/2TPu5QWdFsu1xDbsShYReYr+pdL9E3hcPqwgvh55B7cPysMfeP1CCM co0tpyWOQVXSCo4p9/XKBKor0IpC2+MpGS5/9dfGX2roMZ9DX5s/zQtqVSmYbdq5MJ28 of+efpWMGZmsFtu78ydlfX4a0gaQm6OFXKBf6Ze0n2Zu9vuwGrdyfh5yvk22/H/7l46e N5Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZSOEghPKCvED4AqShvTlLcMtq8WeDMec4v1ysyHF8VhYtDPF/r +lu6/4J3KAeT5Rp5HICN34Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UroBavpy+nAHfIn0hOTIouQgglaYggvXKg3bc18NDnqiB9u6oPQ+Zc389dP1MA3aD/CWiliQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:574d:: with SMTP id l74mr24123208lfb.5.1546562356409; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:39:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.108] ([79.175.3.69]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l63sm11058686lfl.76.2019.01.03.16.39.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:39:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877eflxov0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154121 Archived-At: On 04.01.2019 3:12, Juri Linkov wrote: >> This would be my main objection as well. > > Actually the window is not tiny. It gets more than a half window > from the window there is was called. But now I propose to do this > only for xref-find-definitions. In any case, I'd like to see it in a separate patch (maybe a separate bug#/discussion as well). Let's not mix the proposal in question, which more or less retains the current behavior, with something where the main goal is changing it. >> Maybe via two different xrefs-show-function values. I'm not sure. > > Or maybe better xrefs-display-buffer-alist. I'd have to see the patch.