From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Kyllingstad?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: major mode in new buffers Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:57:23 +0200 Message-ID: <2f8988ff1003300457w38ee4bf0h259cd7a7187298e0@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269950287 30909 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 11:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:58:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 13:58:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwa51-0004sb-S9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:58:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36546 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwa51-0007bP-H7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwa4w-0007bK-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51156 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwa4u-0007ab-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:57:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwa4n-0004Fm-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:57:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:57704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwa4n-0004FQ-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so49026fga.12 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CLUPysOZknn5ed0jUzcmygevSqA3GP80jpSkOWV7wBc=; b=jjYJ4TnJuj5h3Nk1qVooBPCPsQyzDQ4s9gWFhO9AGgc1VSdIjruLCJYE2y52Kt0vLj /1y8aj9wcqUALyW4yRhcoukYc2hnxf1K12b7zFaLlbJmKnC1FDDiYmVwysfeW4Qorh51 Ae5AAupeRhF3BOIFGr2WgqgjMWMjez7Ou6EiY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aDsHrs2RoK/fHsV/UzuuJj7kkkztA0v8HrFSoqJmGLDYBvRk/mZ6V9OXeRNfobIwxi Hl5+sKZPgzm7VZ10hlMRrkMkGjNx1+YLOjYuZfvkMuvdxtMCZoMEaU0nvEIqiJHTMUr7 5KJ4MGislfQTCGHv7CPMSaM1zMmPIH9UFydI8= Original-Received: by 10.239.187.138 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:57:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5146c83edc81a13a Original-Received: by 10.239.182.5 with SMTP id o5mr599605hbg.160.1269950263195; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:57:43 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122904 Archived-At: Hi, new buffers get default-major-mode. I would find it more convenient if auto-mode-alist was used. Is there a disadvantage to that? -- Ren=E9