From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 00:39:18 -0400 Message-ID: <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> References: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ORTgIIDS4lm2aoeuNKuR5IofTEmeC4d9t" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494996017 21557 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 04:40:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 04:40:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 To: Drew Adams , 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 06:40:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkr-0005Nc-Am for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 06:40:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkv-0001RX-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqko-0001Ps-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkj-0002S7-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkj-0002Rr-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkj-0004Gw-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 04:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26959.149499597216384 (code B ref 26959); Wed, 17 May 2017 04:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2017 04:39:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkG-0004GC-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:61892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqkE-0004Fw-UG for 26959@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:39:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.18.195] ([18.189.18.195]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFlnp-1dG5vR0wDd-00EdLR; Wed, 17 May 2017 06:39:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EX8Scu0NSRP/53qOdkK2rslIKqERo66+CEFsSgGKxcGNrH1AqE8 MgyzStbhkHkDJv0lNc3CloscxOZEGgypk0SZyg9nPpS6eveTjJWVN8Z0ezHhrkQDv35w7L0 Is/ZLk9sat+h1966Ltyd1eeYcf880k6OPkOPXDHyhqHEZntLEGhXuWFbAwyQLxTutQVG7bw 3PVwalnliuKUHuFiYh5bg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tdSFBr34IGo=:A8p+HwxESfbGcvUnV8T/Bz hTUT73PFVbVFNztDC0rQhcVc9kVOWi+e7qaJYkaZp6Qd1llSVy22aFDwPIwUwQNTtVHSVPGBB dDHhRmw7kxLJ9KRt4V4rM+U2u+zKssw6gRuDfntncjoxREpl7QVEa5XaqTGJZ7FM8cGoe4KG1 f0iecfx7A+dtvEEEEml4ytwQCcc6oX7rl77M7h9qy9P8AYJdm4nHytAaDJ+MdmegUAsKxLoIZ b9O3zaRtAqV4i8skyvBECGSiO/Y1q9FTDmB1ks+tRMgI+puBb7Vxd7jnYMlyn2MmBWNkIyDu8 7aKagahugjQ6ug5rZC4eNgVDvsIjZ9UlGowHYkeFxmssfHk0zHg1ETbGD0hxopbwHKYp4hLdD cuQwYdQE25foAYNz9zXb6kqwBp49uEvx2p+hHqjGSnbceZvNMNjBwSZWjAnXu6mUjy/g8zDNv yCRVk+FNeUUkND0DQW6kKCePlhNZKW2awn4vFTypvyPWD03OtypCEJibKPYvsBfndoPyEWPjm aX+XSvY4/G6HMZvcqtxhUlOTLMUZaIErq3VI8Ig9mxP/Thp0d2QASZJNLHKm8ijblAlzSBmqx /wocz+pwhRQ9dmVm0RX7NahnCHM3NI2CDpn4GUoquWgcDwtT0KjM90Jq453Sn1YmmImjpWl+m ymyrTk/OPfREWR7aG/W8nxLBmZ8ieCuOaY606kA3n3LZ5r6vvbLzUlr0AqWojkUevnSQ= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132560 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ORTgIIDS4lm2aoeuNKuR5IofTEmeC4d9t Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="64JIt0wT1exGc67buU8tI85pkTQ0Hph6V"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Drew Adams , 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> Subject: Re: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines References: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> In-Reply-To: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> --64JIt0wT1exGc67buU8tI85pkTQ0Hph6V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-05-17 00:21, Drew Adams wrote: >> Could underline thickness be made configurable? It would be nice to be= able >> to pick between regular and thick/bold underlines (the later would be >> obtained by doubling the usual underline thickness, I imagine). >=20 > See my reply to bug #26958. Should we have two requests: Thanks for your replies :) > 1. Wavy (and plain) underline to follow text scaling (#26958). > 2. Be able to configure underline line-width (#26959). Yes, that's a great summary. > Is #2 enough? If we could customize the :line-width for :underline > (and :overline? and :strike-through?), would that be sufficient, or > is there also a need for such lines to be sensitive to text scaling? I don't think so =E2=80=94 sensitivity to text scaling would be a useful,= distinct feature. Otherwise Lisp code will have to inspect font sizes a= nd adjust thickness based on it, which will cause inconsistencies. Addit= ionally, the amount of space between the text and the underline needs to = be adjusted when the font size changes =E2=80=94 and this is currently do= ne on GNU/Linux already. Cl=C3=A9ment. --64JIt0wT1exGc67buU8tI85pkTQ0Hph6V-- --ORTgIIDS4lm2aoeuNKuR5IofTEmeC4d9t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZG9P2AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjYqIP/3RCdrdo/XHsAIoBVRAeAnOn z2KPJTuPPLwK+US5IexHyhd3Iyh28dcWeM/L9IQB1bfn+lKczeqIyFxQKB/wGV3k hSWjA2r5BHAD8Nj6j3zVDwZWC4S46Zm0TR9aQWzYhGXQGVi2I7q2Qp6MzEtmU7RX mXDkMphyw6ACu3jUMuXCrUHtROawbCBNDiExqCTuxSBgcPO7KvMVyANKrlw7ax9U 6CTjAyvsCAxykqJYFDxobrHGlSyDyRUgtx6asYcuQporhSjYiARrdEZxv4Ju53W6 u9a+Ii8+y8ej1xc1NwGWXLnlGNsUcySyLW4I3VjzANX4Uv6CN7pORN8hDMCiDrs9 KVaKt9/vW8MLU+AfADfGZlRGyrCLxJ1zdLesvfUH72GYTcr2lwqOYfYlEkvz8JBA MxaJmou6X8FBIgQdJFMj1fWXfkWZD2CQ83+DTmiyyVtYbHn6CKghtfumR31KJh1a DZOvSHkucDAvZQpoWQhZHe7VzhlyPZQM2mYcJZLCLufd0Dcuaz/Ann+bieTE/Omr Vn3XfGM8dkd5Y8+orM6L3sIWYHuKtLE5Z8Zy6XHlNHiq9vFZ9m6jS2MygCLtdq68 +QO3cnE6vlGjUtL7VCNap1swPzfeJvOxmicPNjlIHgLRrS1E7uAs2S7rWBCyY+k0 G4O3ePfXMvIZadSRF2BV =iCCm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ORTgIIDS4lm2aoeuNKuR5IofTEmeC4d9t--