From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57669: 29.0.50; C-n, C-p off under long lines Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:12:17 +0000 Message-ID: <2e25ca87e3d9ee13ba3e@heytings.org> References: <87y1uujufi.fsf@dick> <83k06effg6.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu5ijcqg.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14725"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 57669@debbugs.gnu.org To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 08 19:13:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL5V-0003Y6-6d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL5U-00016v-1l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL5K-00016j-Ev for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL5K-0007n3-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL5J-0000c1-Pp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57669-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57669.16626571422305 (code B ref 57669); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2022 17:12:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL4g-0000b7-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:60762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWL4c-0000aw-TK for 57669@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:12:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1662657137; bh=8SNo1e9eFycbR4s79GKu5aKIHpAdQietTloNyJLftjo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=7tKawE99YfDnNOzC0HTvt5b3i382h+n7dlevHWyMP0oIEc5T2Bg0YT3lKjP1ln/UU onPDRMIxuMgknIZCN9spWs6e0tEu2BnB1bDBITFTgUCSXpdCqX9tBckBK3wxhYC8VJ Wgg9P/3qb+/H0bdLr1etpkDJlBNyTayqYOHos63W/ZWxAYDoqOReb2L1CB+pP6ERA3 Ixq0UVWXN3op51RU/iID+aUtDQG5KMzN3HoHDfT38neVjx0sx6m+PGlzF64yxDJS42 l/B3uVZ53lfXaYeHUUuQWtzO2OuT5foSSsVRd+1LEl8v9/anj9rBmgrIIZTMrsfYnu wuylWkPEp3qJQ== In-Reply-To: <87tu5ijcqg.fsf@dick> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241928 Archived-At: > > No problem? None? > None, indeed. Even without long lines, C-n and C-p are not 100% accurate. > > This feature comes at a (IMO) very little price, namely... point > sometimes moves to another column... > Indeed. > > He is careful to minimize the issue, but he doesn't say "I see no > problem with that." > I wasn't "careful to minimize the issue", I state what it was black on white. I was careful to minimize its impact, however: it could have been much worse. What we now have is that sometimes, but rarely, point moves to another column. That doesn't make Emacs unusable, does it? > > A "very little price" indeed. > Indeed. I'm glad to read you agree. Or are the quotation marks supposed to convey something else?