From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, 66732@debbugs.gnu.org, dominik@honnef.co
Subject: bug#66732: tree-sitter fontification doesn't update multi-line syntax reliably
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 20:16:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ce274aa-6d01-4d0a-b10c-07f821343fed@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <835y1zo3rw.fsf@gnu.org>
On 11/18/23 12:37 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Ping! Yuan, I'd appreciate if you chimed in on this issue.
>
>> Cc: 66732@debbugs.gnu.org, dominik@honnef.co
>> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 14:22:30 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 02:15:30 +0300
>>> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>>>
>>> Hi Dominik,
>>>
>>> On 24/10/2023 17:22, Dominik Honnef wrote:
>>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Start emacs -q
>>>> 2. Clear the scratch buffer
>>>> 3. Switch to c-ts-mode
>>>> 4. Type the following:
>>>>
>>>> /* foo
>>>> bar
>>>> baz
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> Notice the following:
>>>>
>>>> 1. tree-sitter will not parse the buffer contents as a comment until the
>>>> closing comment marker is typed (not an issue per se.)
>>>>
>>>> 2. When you type the closing comment marker, only that line will be
>>>> fontified.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Moving to the previous line will refontify the whole comment.
>>>>
>>>> Similarly, removing the closing comment marker will not instantly
>>>> refontify the buffer, either.
>>>>
>>>> The expected behavior would be for the whole comment to be refontified
>>>> immediately after typing the closing comment marker.
>>>>
>>>> Other buffer contents often lead to even worse refontifying, where even
>>>> motion will not fix things.
>>> Can repro.
>>>
>>> Only with 'emacs -Q', though (note to others who will try).
>> Yuan, any ideas or comments?
>>
Some background: When buffer content changes, it might invalidate
already-fontified region, as shown in the example: Typing the "*/"
completes the block comment and should cause the comment to be
refontified in comment-face.
The way we achieves this is thought parser notifiers. When tree-sitter
parser reparses, it notifies us of which part of the buffer was affected
by the reparse. For font-lock, we have this font-lock notifier that
marks the affected buffer region as "not fontified", so redisplay will
refontify those areas.
(defun treesit--font-lock-notifier (ranges parser)
"Ensures updated parts of the parse-tree are refontified.
RANGES is a list of (BEG . END) ranges, PARSER is the tree-sitter
parser notifying of the change."
(with-current-buffer (treesit-parser-buffer parser)
(dolist (range ranges)
(when treesit--font-lock-verbose
(message "Notifier received range: %s-%s"
(car range) (cdr range)))
(with-silent-modifications
(put-text-property (car range) (cdr range) 'fontified nil)))))
This notifier function will be called during redisplay [1]. I suspect
that because of this timing, redisplay doesn't refontify the marked
region immediately. So I added a timer, I think that ensures we mark the
affected region in the next command loop?
(defun treesit--font-lock-notifier (ranges parser)
"Ensures updated parts of the parse-tree are refontified.
RANGES is a list of (BEG . END) ranges, PARSER is the tree-sitter
parser notifying of the change."
(with-current-buffer (treesit-parser-buffer parser)
(dolist (range ranges)
(when treesit--font-lock-verbose
(message "Notifier received range: %s-%s"
(car range) (cdr range)))
(run-with-timer
0 nil
(lambda ()
(with-silent-modifications
(put-text-property (car range) (cdr range)
'fontified nil)))))))
This seems to work. Eli, do you see any problem using run-with-timer
this way? What's the correct way to mark some region unfontified?
[1] The chain of events if roughly: user types the last "/" -> redisplay
-> fontify that character -> access parser -> parser reparses -> calls
notifier.
Yuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 14:22 bug#66732: tree-sitter fontification doesn't update multi-line syntax reliably Dominik Honnef
2023-10-24 23:15 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-10-29 12:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-11-18 8:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-11 4:16 ` Yuan Fu [this message]
2023-12-11 12:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-11 14:35 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-11 15:53 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-12 7:50 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-12 12:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-13 3:28 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-13 3:45 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-13 7:12 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-13 14:30 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-14 1:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-14 8:29 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-15 1:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-15 7:12 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-16 5:56 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-16 15:22 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-16 17:11 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-16 17:23 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-16 17:43 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-16 19:18 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-16 19:57 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-16 23:09 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-17 1:16 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-17 18:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-19 3:12 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-20 1:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-20 5:43 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-20 11:31 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-16 23:02 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-20 2:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-20 3:08 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-16 22:56 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-18 18:27 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-18 19:12 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-18 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-18 23:10 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-19 3:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19 3:40 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-19 12:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19 12:44 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-20 20:50 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-23 10:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-23 18:02 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-23 20:46 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-23 20:51 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-23 23:07 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-24 2:10 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-24 3:02 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-23 20:55 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-24 6:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-08 1:40 ` Yuan Fu
2023-12-18 23:08 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-12-20 20:50 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-12 15:34 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ce274aa-6d01-4d0a-b10c-07f821343fed@gmail.com \
--to=casouri@gmail.com \
--cc=66732@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dmitry@gutov.dev \
--cc=dominik@honnef.co \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.