On 2016-12-10 11:01, Yuri Khan wrote:
> If this wasn’t Emacs, I would name lack of localizability as a
> drawback of including code as part of strings. But that’s moot because
> no one writes localizable software in Elisp.

It's an excellent point nonetheless; thanks for mentioning it!
(though part of me wonders if this wouldn't help with localizability, too: assuming fmt was extended to support compile-time constants, I could imagine that the ability to include code in strings may make translation easier)

Thanks for the insight!
Clément.