From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ken Manheimer" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pdbtrack Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:34 -0500 Message-ID: <2cd46e7f0802221000t3e810a39j89b897a19dbef9a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <861w7euz7a.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <2cd46e7f0802150943x46e9bcb0i4c3b6075d48cc979@mail.gmail.com> <18363.29854.271108.937443@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18363.37318.759923.736701@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <2cd46e7f0802211440i44f1efc5n19e892066a63ece9@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203703271 18078 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2008 18:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Glenn Morris" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 22 19:01:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JScCy-0003P5-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:01:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JScCT-0008Sd-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JScCO-0008QP-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JScCM-0008Ny-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JScCL-0008Nv-SS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:37 -0500 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JScCL-0005h8-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:00:37 -0500 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 58so787389wri.10 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:00:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IfxEWnHeHubWjHE6AmkZg3Z95BTjFQDdtEhAKkwj9VA=; b=TXKMndGNv57xD8HXWQbaSfQYUgAfXEFQ+KTHPm34tNjLLsosAa9sui0i3NM6h8dCso3T/E7SmdSdpNtmFfZXMpat3bN87d4N6i7Ye6tOx4Fy/mpmfDH1YS2EntAMcUlWeuf8t9MFMF/RQji7lV2vgiYd7wHrfu/CodhDA9Bmk4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fHnbWyTqqW9Pd5jnCYDfv9ON/DQcwy0xWNiOaDRA/pteMktS5DOkfocMyVzf2uKqRFW62b54bg2CkGHKRwoy7VagUUSmsh2Iq81dTUVcFicUz9ECFwSOtRjsR6RMPQNaMcr8JV75LEb2L672ER8yF9ENYrOL1o5vwf9E+8dGoOk= Original-Received: by 10.114.166.1 with SMTP id o1mr295232wae.71.1203703234843; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:00:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.160.13 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:00:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89994 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > "Ken Manheimer" wrote: > > > none of these functions have anything to do with the pdbtrack changes > > that nick made. they all appear to be preexisting artifacts of an > > incomplete adoption of code from python-mode.el. > > You seem to misunderstand. None of these function references were > there until Nick checked in his pdbtrack changes in rev 1.81. It's not > a "pre-existing" condition. The code that calls these functions has > been attributed to you in the ChangeLog (2008-02-19). oops - you're right, my mistake. i'm sorry to i mistakenly suggested that python.el fails to make proper attributions! (i didn't remember putting the code into python.el because i didn't actually do it - nick copied it from an old version of python-mode.el, and generously attributed the changes to me.) i've committed changes which settle the compiler warnings by removing the python-mode.el ingredients unnecessary for pdbtracking,. i left in python-shell, however, in case that might be useful. hopefully there'll be a more complete reconciliation of the two python mode implementations soon, but until then this should cleanly convey pdbtracking to python.el users. -- ken http://myriadicity.net