my apologies, steve - i was too cursory when i looked back through my
allout correspondance.  i really do appreciate the fix, even if i
didn't  keep your name straight!

i've attached a new ChangeLog fragment, with separate entries for
stephen's and my changes (and a formatting error corrected, besides),
and the same, consolidated patch as before.

ken

On 9/30/06, Stephen Berman <Stephen.Berman@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:04:24 -0400 Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> >           (allout-expose-topic): Rectify implementation of "+" spec, so that
> >           the subtrees are hidden and only the headlines are exposed.
> >           (Thanks to bill white for contributing this fix.)
> >
> > Please don't ever put other people's code under your name in the
> > change log file.  That would confuse our copyright clerk.
> >
> > If that change was written by Bill White, you should put it
> > in a change log entry with his name on it, not under your name.
>
> Since you seem to want an accurate record, I feel compelled to say
> that, unless Bill White happened to send Ken the same patch as I did,
> I think the change he referred to is one I sent him.  Since it's only
> a three line patch, I have no objection to it appearing under Ken's
> name.  If you think it's important that it appear under my name, of
> course I have no objection to that either (and if copyright assignment
> is necessary, I did sign papers for Emacs some years ago).
>
> Steve Berman