From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alberto_Sim=C3=B5es?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: CPerl and Perl 5.10.x Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:10:28 +0100 Message-ID: <2b670b7e0909020610g32bb9b3do6a3d9411c3f97cb0@mail.gmail.com> References: <87d46gatvl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vdk27czm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87eiqpn6hh.fsf@rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255544eae42af0047297fdaf X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251897080 21349 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2009 13:11:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Daniel Pittman Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 02 15:11:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MipcG-0008BC-Lg for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:11:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47760 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MipcF-0003BT-Ig for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mipbi-00036C-Oe for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mipbe-0002vi-Qe for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47112 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mipbe-0002vZ-N7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:48664) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mipbe-0005iG-99 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so834798bwz.42 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:10:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=68BqtEOOJC9Y4JMFqvNjRvdRsyWNWoE7TdzJYufN8yM=; b=g3g4EoM0F2VTb1jrQMR6qAQJ1KeQSzAwrNCyFdXA7r7LtWJ72kteWNT5cdPngO8Ui8 6oSQKkayrrIejXhkG/rt1zfDdLVYZ9ktLy46r2AXrA80p+mBEgdGTKmK3Xg+aOAyQkXz AULqH0gcZbir3TP8VQ19wrw4ySSYt8WyHt9mk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=akQfN5HM8u2ulMBaw5TiDrWJmpOewAD+rUheO5FeCh91Fk7wsWHdVcOpuAGTUNRUNk lBsTTUWHW5ebD5qGhiYt2QNDMFzjFTnYsmK1tPYLx8tb3OMGuLQmtJE7j1tdgiyS6sVq tOkv07zNt+CNG731hT5C6QG/OqRwi3396IRdk= Original-Received: by 10.204.13.195 with SMTP id d3mr6724903bka.135.1251897032047; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:10:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eiqpn6hh.fsf@rimspace.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:67744 Archived-At: --0003255544eae42af0047297fdaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Ilya Zakharevich writes: > > On 2009-09-01, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > >>>> Sorry if I'm being dense: is the Emacs cperl-mode.el out of sync wit= h > >>>> Ilya's version? > > [...] > > >> Sorry, I don't know the answer, but I'm in favor of using the 5.10 > >> highlighting if it must be one or the other. I doubt the difference > >> will matter enough to most users, and those who do will probably prefe= r > >> 5.10. > > > > Why? Myself, I did not see 5.10 yet... (Oups, no. In fact I do have = a > > copy of a binary distribution somewhere on the drive... It is unzipped= , > but > > not installed.) > > Debian/stable ships with Perl 5.10. It is fairly commonly turning up in > similar new releases, such as MacOS 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and other Linux > distributions. > > Most distributions are shipping Perl 5.10. Perl 5.10.0 is out for more than one year. Perl 5.10.1 is out for a week or so. They are two of the best Per= l releases ever (not buggy). Cheers Alberto --=20 Alberto Sim=C3=B5es --0003255544eae42af0047297fdaf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> wrote:<= br>
Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> writes:
> On 2009-09-01, Ted Zlatanov <tz= z@lifelogs.com> wrote:
>>>> Sorry if I'm being dense: is the Emacs cperl-mode.el o= ut of sync with
>>>> Ilya's version?

[...]

>> Sorry, I don't know the answer, but I'm in favor of using = the 5.10
>> highlighting if it must be one or the other. =C2=A0I doubt the dif= ference
>> will matter enough to most users, and those who do will probably p= refer
>> 5.10.
>
> Why? =C2=A0Myself, I did not see 5.10 yet... =C2=A0(Oups, no. =C2=A0In= fact I do have a
> copy of a binary distribution somewhere on the drive... =C2=A0It is un= zipped, but
> not installed.)

Debian/stable ships with Perl 5.10. =C2=A0It is fairly commonly turni= ng up in
similar new releases, such as MacOS 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and other Linux
distributions.


Most distributions are shipping Perl 5.10. Perl = 5.10.0 is out for more than one year. Perl 5.10.1 is out for a week or so. = They are two of the best Perl releases ever (not buggy).

Cheers
Alberto
--
Alberto Sim=C3=B5es

--0003255544eae42af0047297fdaf--