From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Desired behavior on splitting screens in xwidget Webkit Browser Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 01:11:37 +0900 Message-ID: <2F4F5EF6-5695-439B-96E4-09C61C314281@icloud.com> References: <7534417B-6B8D-494C-AC0C-D361C6B3F5C0@icloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="41427"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 19 18:13:46 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hoVVx-000AfY-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:13:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoVVx-00028A-0J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:13:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoVVo-000282-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoVVi-0002pt-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mr85p00im-ztdg06011901.me.com ([17.58.23.198]:60849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoVVd-0001sy-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:13:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1563552702; bh=LMUug0pxpnyVty9ly2TGGzh0Ezq5tvTnLzUxpCJghCM=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=rIyWuqyXkmhDsIsucjsE3ieT4gxReGy4Fdf95cL1Mt20gpCLtnYicvW2I6VZSD3os ziIcTRshs5iB2D7sa2mraj6+AHhBapck9fi7JPlZJvydS+9VBbKRWKZ4HFSmh491rk UdK/LTypmTJ+yLhYVVDcRXwgit0c0WUTEwBoJF4lU8OVdpDIFY4KX5TNZsQbw5MVnn Oega7txQ7N8SpvJieqVXK/ieiTGP3d8m6ak0bVKmHvR0LLxa6R0dDpO7QCv5nzDX+J O0u8FzxKyCgb9YJthj66CzITp9MWNnoNExqAGbYwHlxLd/FDC+JtL16ON4uTcYG10/ sI2rRR20SKkFQ== Original-Received: from [192.168.0.11] (unknown [1.230.108.64]) by mr85p00im-ztdg06011901.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FC62A60CEB; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:11:41 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-19_11:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=759 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1812120000 definitions=main-1907190176 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 17.58.23.198 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238708 Archived-At: > 2019. 7. 20. =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 1:09, Stefan Monnier = =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: >=20 >> Currently, displaying one xwidgets in two different buffers is not = supported. >=20 > But the user can still cause it to happen. What happens in this case? The xwidget buffer shows nothing, with an error message =E2=80=98Viewing = two xwidget buffers simultaneously is not supported.' >> What should be the desired behavior when splitting buffers in the >> xwidget Webkit Browser? >=20 > Maybe it should just do the split "normally" with one of the two = windows > displaying the xwidget and the other displaying some kind of "error > information=E2=80=9D. Yeah, I think that=E2=80=99s probably right :-) > You'll probably want to keep the kind of "clone" commands you = currently > have under C-x 2 and C-x 3, but let the user request them explicitly > (e.g. under a different key-binding). OK. >=20 > Stefan >=20