From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8624: 24.0.50; `font-lock-default-fontify-buffer' Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:18:16 -0700 Message-ID: <2D8FDEE737704163ADF7566482DFA2C2@us.oracle.com> References: <873ABEC2323B4114AD8FAEF8B264889F@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310739574 8648 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2011 14:19:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8624@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 15 16:19:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEk-0006dM-IO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:19:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46197 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEj-0000EY-20 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEO-0000E1-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEN-00040H-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEM-00040B-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjEM-0000sA-DS; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8624 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8624-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8624.13107395123306 (code B ref 8624); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2011 14:18:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjDr-0000rH-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhjDq-0000r0-RW for 8624@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p6FEINNA021022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:18:25 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6FEIMGg011773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:18:23 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt118.oracle.com (abhmt118.oracle.com [141.146.116.70]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6FEIHUM016397; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.34.212) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:18:17 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcxC8qjkaeMwfW/xQ6aTm/K2iFWOjAABuXnA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4E204C31.006E:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:19:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49137 Archived-At: > What would you imagine these doc strings would say? "(un)fontify the > region according to the default font-lock rules; see the manual for > details"? If that's what these functions do, then yes. But only if the manual actually explains things, i.e., provides the details. And wrt putting such a sentence in the manual (not just in the doc strings), it needs to cross-reference the precise node or nodes where this is explained. This should be a no-brainer, at least in terms of need if not in terms of the explanations to add. Today we in effect refer people to non-existent doc. We do not explain this today.