From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-g crash in C-x C-f (OSX Lion) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:48:30 +0100 Message-ID: <2B63BF25-A829-4C70-A2AC-2E384790FDDA@swipnet.se> References: <4EEB48B2.9090602@swipnet.se> <4EEF5E72.2010007@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324316926 9337 80.91.229.12 (19 Dec 2011 17:48:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 19 18:48:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RchKJ-00027t-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:48:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36098 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchKJ-0007Pl-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:48:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchKG-0007NM-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:48:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchKF-0005Kg-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:48:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:41806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchKF-0005KN-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DEF95E5 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:48:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 19360 invoked by uid 89); 19 Dec 2011 17:47:51 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 19 Dec 2011 17:47:51 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 863747FA058; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:48:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146836 Archived-At: Hello. 19 dec 2011 kl. 17:53 skrev Carsten Mattner: > So I guess we should concentrate on the reproducable crash in > the old tree with the older revno. >=20 > Any stack frames you want me to inspect? > Maybe we can pinpoint another should-not-happen fault. I think we must approach this from another angle. The stack traces = available can't pinpoint the source of the memory problem (if indeed it = exists). I shall run Pauls static checking and see if valgrind gives = anything. Thanks for the offer. Jan D. =20